Jakarta – Ulama & Activist Defenders Team (TPUA) came to the police’s criminal investigation building. TPUA expressed objections to the outcome of the case title and the decision to stop the investigation into the issue of False Diploma 7th President Joko Widodo (Jokowi). “We came here to insist the special case title. There are our objection to the results of the case title and the results of the investigation stopped on May 22,” TPUA deputy chairman Rizal Fadhillah said on Monday (5/26/2025). Rizal said the objection was set out at 26 points in the letter he delivered. One of them ended the termination of the investigation and case degree conducted by the criminal investigation. Browse to continue with the content “Why? Because it is not the reporter and reported, whose name is the matter, begins with the process of searching for evidence, and lifting the search results, then the opinion of the reporter and report,” says Rizal. “But it is not, the reporter is not invited, the report is not invited. So it is very internal, even though the decision is very decisive,” he continued. Secondly, he considered the investigation process in the case, incomplete or incomplete. Because a number of experts in the evidence recorded with his party and the thesis supervisor of Jokowi were not questioned by the investigator. Rizal also regarded the announcement of the results of the investigation into the case as trends and misleading. Because the investigator even concluded that the diploma was originally. “It determines identical, non-identified. As authentic, authentic, not identical. Therefore, we call it that there is a wrong guidance. What is being investigated is identical, non-identified, which is originally concluded. Even in the authenticity framework. I think it’s something we can’t accept,” Rizal said. He also mentions the proof conducted by investigators too much. Because only by just touching and not being included in the category of scientific crime investigations. “Barekrim by touching and looking at the sink, then it is called the handshake and it is a letter pressure. Ah, it can’t, the research must be scientific, paper test, ink test,” Rizal explained. The pursuit of special titles, says Rizal, was not just because he was not satisfied. Due to a clear legal basis. “The case is a general concern, I think it is so in his Perkolrrh. If the matter is a public case, a special case title can be filed. Because we do not feel that the usual title is not optimal yesterday, and is not open, and is not in line with the existing regulations,” he explained. He also talked about the protection of victims, witnesses and reporters. Rizal said reporters, witnesses, victims should not be prosecuted, and that the investigation process should not be prosecuted and not prosecuted. Including the case of the Supreme Court Regulation number 1 of 1956 which regulates the relationship between criminal affairs and civil affairs. He said the report in criminal investigation should have been stopped because there was a civil case that took place. In the end, he doubts the forensic test conducted by investigators. Rizal suspected that the forensic test was not performed in depth. “For example, since there is no visible facial recognition. In the diploma there is a photo, all doubt is that the photo of Mr. Jokowi should be a facial recognition test,” Rizal added. “So it is a serious question that this forensic test is really done in depth, scientific or only its simple nature, but the conclusion, conclusions that bind like legally. While the conclusion like this is not legally binding,” he continued. Rizal said he would complain about the results of the investigation, National Police Irwasum and the Ombudsman. He emphasized that he would not stop the outcome of the investigation announced by criminal investigation. “So God wants, TPUA will continue to move and could not say that it was completed with the Dirtypidum statement on May 22, 2025,” he said. The Diploma of Jokowi is identical to the previous comparison. Criminal investigation police have received documents related to the authenticity of the false diploma of 7th President Joko Widodo (Jokowi). Investigators tested Jokowi’s diploma with the comparison document and the results were identical. “The investigator received the original document of the forestry diploma number 1120 on behalf of Joko Widodo with NIM 1681KT from the Faculty of Forestry UGM on November 5, 1985, which was tested, together with a comparison of 3 colleagues during the lecture at the Faculty of Forestry, Thursday (5/2). Testimony and comparison are identical.
Investigating the issue of false diploma Jokowi stopped but conveyed objections
