Ago: 2 advocates pay demonstration until it builds the narrative that affects the session

Jakarta – ago, lawyers, Junaedi Saibih (JS) and Marcela Santoso (MS), and Tian Bahtiar (TB), director of the Jak TV report, erected as suspects in the case of the investigation into sugar imports and tinging cases. The two advocates are believed to be financing the demonstration to draw up a narrative to influence the hearing. “While the process is currently underway in court at a cost of RP. 478,500,000, paid to TB by the suspects of MS and JS, which is carried out in the following way. (22/22/2025) Early morning. or defendant dealt with the suspect MS and the suspect JS, harmed as the legal advocate of the suspect or the defendant, “he explained. In addition, JS advocate made positive narratives and opinions for his team. He also made a narrative of the calculation of state losses in the TIN case. “Creating a methodology for calculating state losses in dealing with the a quo case conducted by the prosecutor’s office is wrong and misleading. Then the TB suspect dumped it into a number of social media and online media,” he said. According to the Ago, the two advocates who were suspects also financed the demonstration. The offenders also made seminars to speak programs. “The suspects MS and JS financed protests in an attempt to prevent the investigation, prosecution and proof of the a quo case during the hearing, while he took place, and together with TB TB, TB negatively published the narratives of the protest in the news of the prosecutor’s office,” he said. “The suspect MS and the suspected JS kept the activities of seminars, podcasts and talk shows in various online media and financed by leading negative narratives in the news to influence the proof of the case during the hearing, and then covered by the TB suspect and the official accounts Jak TV, among others, The attempts that the suspect has made to overturn the prosecutor’s office. In Handling Corruption Cases of Tin Trade and Sugar Trading System Both during investigation and at the trial which is currently ongo “so their goal is clear by forming negative opinions, as if the investigators handled incorrectly, disturbing the contract, so that they are extracted, or Their expectations can be released or at least disrupted the concentration of the investigation, “he added. (Lir/Lir) HOEGENG Awards 2025 Read the inspiring story of the exemplary police candidate here