"Invidia": The Chinese army will not depend on our chips on the possibility of limiting it

Jinsen Huang CEO Jinsen Huang said the US government should not be worried that the Chinese army had used its company’s products to improve its capabilities. In response to Washington’s most important concerns that it relied on increasing restrictions on US technology exports to China, Huang said the Chinese army would avoid US technology because of the risks associated with this. “There is no need to worry about it.” He continued: “They simply cannot rely on it, as it can of course be limited at any time.” Previous calls to alleviate the restrictions, “invitation” and the billions of dollars views have lost revenue due to the increasingly strict rules designed to prevent China from reaching the most powerful capabilities of artificial intelligence. Successive US administrations insist that the unconfirmed use of the most powerful ingredients is a threat to national security. The CEO of “Invidia”, who visited Washington last week before a trip to Beijing, argued that this strategy would fail because it would stimulate the growth of local capabilities in China, which will eventually compete with those developed by the US technology industry. Invidia and its peers confirm that US businesses should be allowed to export to the largest market in the world, to maintain the centrality of their products in the development of artificial intelligence. Presses on Trump met Huang last week US President Donald Trump to show his position again, and he expressed his support to promote the administration to increase the local production of sediments. Invidia and other businesses depend on Taiwan’s manufacturing facilities for the semiconductor industry, the majority of which is on the island of Taiwan, outside the Chinese head. Trump has successfully priced ‘Invidia’ and the growth of becoming the first US company with a market value of $ 4 billion. The details of the meeting held in the White House have not yet been unveiled between the two parties, but so far the political leadership of the two parties has acted not to allow Chinese businesses to reach this technology further.