Is the consent of AG or SG needed for a contempt request, what did the Supreme Court say about the petition against Nishikant Dubey? - Rahul Gandhiis US statement on the Electoral Commission arises political riot

Nishikant Dubey said that Parliament should dissolve parliament if the court ruled it, while he objected to the High Court decision to make a time limit to make a decision for a bill for the president and the governor. BJP President JP Nadda warned him against Nishikant’s statement. Jagran Bureau, New -Delhi. The Supreme Court told the lawyer on Monday that the court’s contempt proceedings against BJP parliamentary Nishikant Dubey that our consent is not needed for this. The approval of the Attorney General will have to be taken in this case. According to the Retirement Act, 1971 of the Court, permission must be obtained from the Attorney General (AG) or Attorney (SG) to first carry out criminal contempt proceedings against someone in the Supreme Court. What the court said that Nishikant Dubey objected to the Supreme Court decision to set a deadline for the president and governor to make a time limit to make a decision on a bill, Nishikant Dubey said that if the court began to decide, parliament should be dissolved. BJP President JP Nadda warned him against Nishikant’s statement. A lawyer on Monday requested to introduce contempt proceedings before the Bank of Justice Br Gavai and Judge Eighthein George Christ, who calls Nishian Dubey’s contempt as a contempt of court to which the bank made the above remarks. Criminal proceedings against Nishikant: The file had earlier filed a direct petition in the Supreme Court by former Uttar Pradesh IPS AMITABH Thakur, requesting the Supreme Court to take automatic knowledge and requested to start criminal contempt proceedings against Nishikant. The law consists of a maximum of six months of simple imprisonment or a fine of Rs 2,000 in the crime of contempt of court or punishment of both. However, if the court is satisfied to apologize for the culprits, he can also forgive him. In the contempt of the court, the Supreme Court convicted the lawyer Prashant Bhushan of contempt of court in the two -year case against the judiciary in 2020. However, the court imposed a symbolic fine of only one rupee on Prashant Bhushan. If Bhushan did not pay well during the period determined by the court, he could be banned from advocating for three months and plead for three years. Also read: Nishikant Dubey: Besides BJP-JMM In the case of Nishikant Dubey, did these people come out in support of MP? Every latest news and accurate information from the country and the world, every moment on your phone! Download now- Jagran app