Is the winter of artificial intelligence solution?

I wrote at the beginning of the year that Wall Street investors are ready for ‘Ai Winter’ during 2025; It is not necessarily a slowdown in investment, and certainly not in the media noise issued by companies, but in tangible progress. Our patience will be tested. Some recent events require us to ask the question: Is the winter of artificial intelligence resolved? Earlier this month, the ‘oben Ai’ of the long-awaited new model, ‘GPT-5’ (GPT-5), launched, amid a lukewarm reception. If this step is towards general artificial intelligence as the company has repeated a lot, it is a very small step. The model was not well received by some supporters of the “Chat BT”, which forced the company to embarrass and reproduce old models. Altamman’s claim soon became that ‘Chat GBT-5’ is just a joke with an expert ‘PhD’. At the same time, the shares of “Coreweave Inc”, one of the few businesses specializing in artificial intelligence, fell by more than 25% last week to financial guidelines that increased the concern of investors: revenue growth is expected to be significantly slower than the growth of capital costs. (The period of ban on the first public offer was about to end, which also had an impact on the decline in the stock). Also read: Investors abandon the most affected shares of artificial intelligence and despite the problems of determining the benefit of artificial intelligence, or what will be achieved in the business world, but a study conducted by McKinsey & Company must stop where everyone stops. While eight of the ten companies included in the survey said it was applying obstetrician intelligence in his business, the consulting company noted that many of them said: “There was no influence on the net profit.” The shock of the new model caused the reaction to the “GBT-5 Chat-5”, especially the former skeptics celebration of artificial intelligence. One of the most prominent of them, the scientist Gary Marcus, was delighted with the clear reprimand by the “Chat BT-5”. “The reputation of Altman is now completely burned,” he wrote along with a long list of tasks that look trivial and that the new model could not implement in an acceptable way. Journalist Brian Merchant pointed out that Altamman looked less ready to use the phrase “general artificial intelligence” after his latest models of artificial intelligence are not such a high efficiency. “I think it’s not a very useful term,” Altman told CNBC. Merchant said it was a term that Altamman used a lot, also in February on his personal blog. It was then useful to raise billions of dollars. Other striking statements have been taken over the past few days. “Are we at a stage in which investors are excessively enthusiastic for artificial intelligence? My opinion is yes,” he told a group of journalists last week. And he had another comment: “I expected (oben ai) trillion dollars.” My favorite comment, from his interview with the “CBC” channel a week ago: “It’s good that we’re not a listed company.” I bet on it! During this time, I wondered how investors would deal with the ‘chat GBT-5’ if ‘Oben Ai’ was a listed company. At least I think the company would face a similar week for the “Core WIV” week when investors considered users’ anger, somewhat retreated from supernatural intelligence and predicted the need for extra dollars. (Altman said he is confident in the ability of the business to find out a ‘new type of financial and computer financial instruments’ to finance the rapid industrial expansion. I think we now know at least one book in the training data of the “CABTTT -5” training). Read more: “GPT-5” did not overcome his disturbing problem, a moderate opinion on the other hand. The consequences have not expanded to other shares closely related to the company “oben ai”, such as “Microsoft” and “Invidia”. This indicates that investors’ concerns have not been much destroyed, and this can be attributed to more moderate analyzes. One of the justifications is that an embarrassing errors, such as the inability to spell the word “blueberry”, are just trivial errors that neglect the greatest image: the “chat GBT-5” is more advanced to choose the appropriate model for the task, and if it looks normal, is practical and useful on the ground. Another opinion is that the capabilities have improved enough, so that the leading artificial intelligence instruments can perform certain tasks – and the return on investment will begin to appear. Or that can’t happen, and this month will be seen as an important thing. I don’t think we can call it the winter of artificial intelligence – but there is no doubt that the sudden cold started in the atmosphere. What I withdrew from the launch of the “GBT-5 Chat-5”, that although artificial intelligence enterprises can show general performance on different standards, these standards have become less important. These results, which are difficult for all but artificial intelligence researchers, do not mean much to the ultimate user, whether he is the consumer or the CEO. What determines the narrative about progress or incomplete artificial intelligence is the practical application, and here all artificial intelligence companies are still suffering from shortcomings. The GPT-3.5 was present for months until the ‘Chat BT’, which blinded the world- appeared until we all discovered its many mistakes, not by laboratory experiences of millions of requests, but through our eyes. The independent code based on artificial intelligence is perhaps the next phase of the “chat BT” if their performance is effective. For the ‘Blueberry Benchmark’ which measures the achievement of practical benefit. Urgent need for better results, otherwise investors may face a very cold period.