Why Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei thinks that a 10-year-old AI regulation of AI regulation is dangerous | Mint

Dario Amodei, CEO of AI firm Anthropic, has criticized a Republican proposal to stop the regulation of artificial intelligence at the state level for ten years, calling the measure “far too blunt” in a sharp-worded opinion published in New York Times. The proposal, which is allegedly embedded in former President Donald Trump’s tax reduction revival, seeks to prevent individual US states from enforcing their own AI regulations. According to the supporters, it is intended to create a united national framework. However, this faced a significant setback, including a two-party coalition of State Attorney General who has already put in place precautions against the use of high risk. You may be interested in Amodei, whose company is supported by Amazon, argued that the rapid rate of AI advance requires a more agile and balanced approach. “A ten -year moratorium is far too blunt. Ai is progressing too fast, ‘he wrote. “Without a clear plan for a federal response, a moratorium would give us the worst of both worlds – no ability for states to act, and no national policy as a backup.” Instead, Amodei asked for a coordinated effort between the White House and the Congress to develop a federal transparency standard. Such a framework, he suggested, would force AI developers to openly disclose their test methods, risk strategies and national security considerations before releasing advanced models. Anthropic already shares these details in public, Amodei noted, and opponents Openai and Google Deepmind have adopted similar practices. However, he warned that voluntary transparency is not sustainable as AI systems are becoming more powerful and commercial interests are rising. “Legislative incentives may be needed to ensure that this openness continues,” he said. Amodei’s intervention adds weight to a call to a federal framework that retains public safety, while ensuring that innovation is not suffocated, a balance that can be increasingly difficult to strike as AI instruments become more sophisticated and deeply embedded in daily life. (With input of Reuters)