KPK is struggling to investigate witnesses to the Cirebon Pltu-2-Copy case: Alder in Korea

Jakarta -The KPK has acknowledged the problems investigating witnesses related to the Cirebon 2 steam power plant (PLTU) construction project. “So this team, if I wasn’t wrong some time ago, was in Korea. It was indeed difficult, most of Hyundai Witnesses, of Hyundai, returned to Korea,” acting acting and execution of the KPK Asep Guntur Rahayu said during a press conference on the KPK building, South Jakarta, Thursday (2/10/2025). Asep explained that the rented company for the construction of the Cirebon 2 pltu also returned to Korea. Nevertheless, it still communicates with the contractor. Browse to continue the content, he also said the KPK deepens another of the suspects, Herry Jung. Asep said he was still investigating the role of Herry Jung. “Then also relate to the problem, we again explore the roles of Herry Jung. Does Herry Jung give something to bribe? Or is he asked by this Sunjaya? ‘ Asep explains. As for the investigation of Herry Jung, the KPK was last investigated as a suspect in the red and white building on Monday (5/26). Herry Jung himself has been named a suspect by the KPK since 2019. But so far it has not been detained. Herry allegedly gave a bribe to former Cirebon Regent Sunjaya Purwadisastra worth RP 6.04 billion related to the licensing of PT Cirebon Energi Infrastructure PLTU-2 in Cirebon Regency of the initial promise of RP 10 billion. Bribes are allegedly given cash and gradually in cash. Besides Herry Jung, the KPK called Sunjaya Purwadisastra in this case. He was listed as the Regent of Cirebon for the period 2014-2019. This case was the development of the OTT case, previously the KPK OTT performed on October 24, 2019, which made Sunjaya and Cirebon PuPR official Gatot Rachmanto as a bribery in the sale and purchase of positions in Cirebon Regency. In the period 2014-2019, Sunjaya was recorded as money worth $ 64 billion and has disguised assets due to its crime by the TPPU worth RP 37 billion. Sunjaya was also stated that the section 12B of the Act number 31 of 1999 violated the eradication of corruption crimes, as amended by Act number 20 of 2001 regarding amendments to the Act number 31 of 1999 regarding the eradication of corruption crimes in collaboration with section 65 paragraph (1) of the criminal code, as the first accusation. Dan, section 12 letter A of the Act Number 31 of 1999 regarding the eradication of corruption crimes, as amended by the Act number 20 of 2001 regarding the amendment of the Act Number 31 of 1999 regarding the eradication of corruption crimes in collaboration with section 65 paragraph (1) of the penalty code, as the second charge of the first alternative. (AZH/AZH)