Kumar Vishwas' wife and former RPSC member Manju Sharma, a review of a review submitted in the Supreme Court, said: 'Undeveloped comments were made against me'

Manju Sharma, a former leader of the AAAM AADMI Party (AAP) and former member of the Rajasthan Disclosure Commission (RPSC), submitted a review in the Rajasthan High Court. In this petition, he demanded that the strict comments made by the court should be revised again. What was said in the petition? Manju Sharma says he did not make a party and did not have the opportunity to speak during the trial during the hearing. He calls it a violation of the judicial process. The petition made clear that only ‘contact’ was mentioned in the charge page, but it is not right to damage the reputation of a public officer on this basis. Manju Sharma argues that it adversely affected her image and career. The former RPSC member said an objection to unfair remarks that the comments made by the court are very rigid and inappropriate. The creation of a person’s credibility without creating a party and giving an opportunity for trial is a violation of the right to justice. He requested the court to remove these comments from the records. Background is noted that the Supreme Court made several remarks during the recent trial of a case related to the Rajasthan State Service Commission. Manju Sharma has now objected to these remarks. He says there was no concrete evidence on the basis on which this remark was made. Only the charge page recorded contact, which was increased to injuries to their personal reputation. Manju Sharma demanded a judicial review, the court requested that his case be seen fairly and the comments laid against him should be removed with judicial dignity. He says that the court must protect any person’s reputation and rights. By questioning the constitutional rights, it is also mentioned in the petition that each person has a fair trial and the right to speak. If someone is commented against him without making a party, it is a violation of the principles of natural justice. He said that this matter is not only of his personal reputation, but also to ensure that it does not happen to anyone else in the future. The next trial will now hear the Supreme Court this review of the review. Legal experts believe that if the court corrects the arguments of Manju Sharma, these remarks can also be removed from the records. At the same time, this matter can also be seen as an example of how important the protection of any person’s rights and prestige is in court. Share this story -tags