Large defense agreement between Pakistan and Saudi Arabia equipped with a nuclear bomb will be considered an attack on both, which is threatened for India

On September 17, 2025, a document was signed in the luxury Yamama Palace in Riyadh, the capital of Saudi Arabia. The agreement between Saudi Arabia and Pakistan clearly states: “Attack each attacks both.” The agreement is an alternative shield for Saudi Arabia, while it is an economic incentive for Pakistan. The two countries appointed the agreement as ‘strategic regulatory defense agreement’. According to Al Jazeera, Riyadh believes that after this agreement Saudi Arabia will get the ‘atomic umbrella’ of Islamabad. At a time when the Golfland Qatar has been attacked twice over the past few months, this indirect confidence in Saudi Arabia’s ‘Pakistani atomic bomb’ is important. At the same time, Pakistan, who is on the verge of economic kangali, subsidized on the debt of IMF, in Chinese debt and Saudi oil, found a reliable security partner on the world scene as Saudi Arabia. Here, an important question arises from the point of view of India. If Saudi Arabia makes the army of Pakistan his patron, will it be responsible for the activities of terrorists thriving out of the Pakistan country? Pakistan has long been a safe haven for terror groups. Organizations such as Lashkar-E-Taiba, Jaish-E-Mohammed Target India from here. From the attack in Parliament in 2001, the attacks of Mumbai in 2008 following the recent incidents of Pulwama and Pahalgam, Masood Azhar, Hafiz Saeed emerged. The shadow of ISI is also clearly visible in these attacks. If these Pakistan terrorists do or try again in the future against India, what will the reaction of Saudi Arabia be in such a situation? Who will guarantee the exploitation of terrorists? The question is, what will Saudi Arabia do in such a situation with Pakistan with security partnership? Will Saudi Arabia guarantee the actions of such terrorists in Pakistan? This is such a question on which the basis of this agreement is based on the answer. But (aggression) usually means attacking the state or the state. The inclusion of non-governmental attacks in this category leads to legal complications. There is no clear provision in the agreement between these two countries that internal attacks by terrorists have been brought under the overview of this agreement. Pakistan showed its glory to the domestic audience, but Pakistan’s security experts offer the agreement as a great victory of Islamabad to the domestic audience. Javid Hasan, who was the Ambassador of Pakistan in Iran, told Jio TV: “This agreement will be clearly a sign for countries such as India or Israel, and they will be discouraged by taking any aggressive steps against Pakistan or Saudi Arabia. surprise ”. Pre -senator is warned. Scenario of South Asia clearly says: “This agreement will not prevent India from attacking Pakistan.” This agreement will not prevent India from attacking Pakistan. But Pakistan is in a very good position because of the three major powers – China, Türkiye and now Saudi Arabia – which is completely in favor of Pakistan. Professor Muktadar Khan at Delaware University of America told the BBC: ‘If India attacks Pakistan, even if Saudi Arabia does not send its army, it has dollars. Saudi Arabia can provide financial assistance to the Pakistani army. Saudi has American technology and can also give this technology to Pakistan. It will be a big case for the Pakistani army. India never raises the tension against Pakistan and does not attack the first. India’s military reaction against Pakistan has always been retaliation again. Surgical strike, balacot strike and operation Sindoor are examples of this. These responsible reactions of India

Exit mobile version