Amid allegations of theft of votes in Haryana, the Election Commission handled the front, Mohan Lal Badauli said- we would get 22 seats; If ... - Chandigarh News Electoral Commission explains about the allegations of voting theft

Haryana’s chief election officer said that the voter lists amends are a normal process and that political parties have enough time to improve the error. He denied the allegations of theft of votes, saying that objections were not filed on voter lists. The affidavit was sought for the allegations of Rahul Gandhi, which is yet to be answered. State Bureau, Chandigarh. Haryana election officer A Srinivas, who sent an affidavit on the allegations of theft of votes by sending notice to the leader of opposition in the Lok Sabha, said that the voter lists for Lok Sabha and elections for the meeting are a normal and routine process. Each phase of the preparation of the states’ voters list is provided by the Electoral Commission sufficient time and opportunity to improve the participation and errors of political parties, so that pure voter lists can strengthen democracy. He denied that a kind of voice was stolen in the election. At the same time, it was worried that some political parties after the publication of voter lists had no objection to them, which meant there was no mistake in the voter lists. The leader of Congress Rahul Gandhi held a press conference in New -Delhi and said about Haryana, like the rest of the states, that Congress lost eight seats in the state by 22 thousand 779 votes. In response, BJP president Mohan Lal Badouli and chief minister Naib Singh claimed that seven meetings in the state lost the margin of less than 3500 votes. If the BJP got 22 thousand votes, the party would have won 22 more seats in the state. In the midst of this allegation and counter-meeting, the Haryana election officer sought an affidavit from Rahul Gandhi and sought an answer that had not yet come up. The chief election officer said that the digital and published physical copies were made available to all political parties after the publication of the draft voter list, and that they were also placed on the website of the India Electoral Commission so that everyone could observe it. A Srinivas said voters and political parties get a full month to register claims and objections before publishing the final voters list after the publication of the draft voter list. After the publication of the final voters list, a bilateral appeal process is adopted, in which the first appeal can be made with the district magistrate and the second appeal can be made by the main election officer of each state/trade union area. It seems that some political parties and their agents on the level (blisters) did not investigate the voter lists at the right time, and if there was a mistake, it was not brought to the knowledge of SDM/ERO, Deo or CEO. According to the chief election officer, some political parties and individuals are now preparing issues on errors in voter lists, including voter lists that were compiled earlier. If these issues were raised by the right medium at the right time, it would have helped the SDM and ERO to correct errors before the election. The Electoral Commission welcomes the investigation into the voters list by political parties and any voter. This will help SDM and ero to remove errors and purify the voter list, which has always been the purpose of the Electoral Commission.