“The man may not have an interest, but in the inlaws …”, the important order of the court on the rights of the girls -in -law is updated: di, 16 Sep 2025 02:15 am (IST) The Madhya Pradesh Supreme Court said that girls were a legal right to stay in the marital home. The Gwalior Bank rejected the Mother -In -law’s petition in which the demands of the property of the girls -in -in -law were disputed. The court said that there is no authority in property in terms of the Hindu Follow -up Act, but the right to stay in the marriage home is valid. Important order of the Madhya Pradesh High Court. (Lying photo) Digital desk, New -Delhi. The Madhya Pradesh Supreme Court said in an important order that the girls -in -Law has a protected legal right to stay in the home, even if they are not ‘participants or successors’ in their property in the Laws. The Supreme Court’s Gwalior Bank gave this order at the trial of a petition submitted by the two marriages on behalf of her mother -in a challenge of Susral’s claim of interest in assets. The Supreme Court rejected the Mother -in -Law’s petition, the Supreme Court rejected the Mother -In -law’s petition and said that the women of their two sons could not claim an interest in the property so that they could not be sued for their share in property. The girls -In -law has demanded the right to stay in their marriage home and prevent them from being evicted. Remove the ad, just read the news, what did the court say? In the case, in its order, the single bank of the Supreme Court made clear that girls or girls in the Hindu Succession Act were not empowered in property, but their right to stay in the marriage home is valid. The court said that the girls -In -law could not be prevented from living in their usual home and that they also had this right under the Protection of Family Violence Act. What is the matter? In fact, two married women filed a lawsuit in Gwalior District Court, saying that they live in the house of the property of the inlaves that are separate from their good people. She in -laws wants him to force him out of the house and sell a home. Both married women requested the district court to keep them in the home on the argument that they were also part of the property of the Man Sasural. The district court rejected its argument. In the Supreme Court, the Mother -in -Law of both the married people filed a petition and contested their claim for the property. The order of the hearing again on the claims of the Bahu canceled from the lower court. The Supreme Court canceled the command of the Gwalior Lower Court and allowed the marriage of the married people to continue. The Supreme Court, referring to the former Supreme Court decisions, said that if one of the many relief claimed in the hearing, the entire lawsuit cannot be rejected, so the lawsuit cannot be abolished, even if the claim of the share in the property is not valid.
‘Man may not have been stopped but in -laws …’, important court order on the rights of the girls
