Mask escalates the legal conflict with Altman and accuses ‘Openai’ of Monopoly

Elon Musk is escalated with the intensity of Sam Altman, where he claimed in a legal document that Openai is trying to control the onto AI market at the expense of safety in the field of superiority in the field. In a revised version of the case documents he submitted in August, Musk set out its concerns related to combating monopoly over ‘Opin AI’, which set up a non -profit company in 2015, and her attempt in the current period to restructure to become a profitable company after getting billions of dollars and others. He became a purposeful business for profit, and Diss, which founded its upcoming company “Xai” last year, indicated that “Oben Ai” has now abandoned all justifications to continue to work as a charity aimed at benefiting humanity, and focuses on openness and safety in light of his attempt to complete the restructuring process within a period of less than two years. The billionaire advocates wrote late Thursday in a amended lawsuit to Federal Court in Auckland, California: ‘It seems (Microsoft) and (OBEN AI) were not satisfied with their monopoly or almost-for-the field of obstetric artificial intelligence, and they are seeking effort in the current period to fund competitive companies. Directly after the request for comment outside the usual working hours. Competitors of the powers on the documents of Thursday were the prosecutor in California, Rob Punta, to the defendants, as the company holds preliminary discussions with the Punta office on the process of changing its institutional structure, according to what “Bloomberg” revealed this month. Representatives from the Punta office did not respond directly to the request for comment outside the usual working hours. In order to make his claim that ‘Oben Ai’ has made more efforts to eliminate competition, Musk in the lawsuit indicated that the company ‘is trying to deprive competitors of skills in the field of artificial intelligence by attracting employees with generous salaries, and that it was spent in the $ 1.5 billion process on employees of no more than 1,500 employees. “Musk also expressed his concern that ‘Oben Ai’ began contracting with the Ministry of Defense, and canceled a clause of use policies that prohibited the use of its technology in any activity in which the risk of physical injuries such as the development of weapons, army or war risks.” The documents also indicated that a large number of security researchers were resigned in protest, or forced to resign, and that security teams were resolved, “it is all to make way for security employees whose real function is to facilitate military contracts.”