Money 'welcome drink' 5 thousand US dollars appear in the bribery case of judges

Jakarta – The trial of the bribery case of judges related to the freelance sentence to the defendant of the Cooking Oil Corporation was rolled out. The fact of hot money in the case began to reveal on court. The panel of judges handed to the defendant of the Migor Corporation is chaired by Judge Djuyamto with members of Agam Syarief Baharudin and Ali Muhtarom. The prosecutor charged Djuyamto, Agam, Ali to receive bribes and satisfaction together related to the freelance ruling. The total bribe received was allegedly 40 billion RP. The bribes were allegedly given by Ariyanto, Marcella Santoso, Junaedi Saibih and M Syafei as advocates of the Migor Corporate Defendants. Browse to continue with the RP 40 billion bribe content is shared between Djuyamto, Agam, Ali, former chairman of the South Jakarta District Court, as well as former deputy chairman of the Central Jakarta District Court, Muhamad Arif Nuryanta, and former Northern Jakarta Pn -siviele Registrar, Wahyu Gunawan. The bribe value is RP. 60 billion, Ariyanto Bakri, admitted to trying to give the judge bribes, so that the defendant in the export permit of the rough palm oil (CPO) was convicted of cooking oil. Ariyanto claims it handed over 60 billion RPS for bribery, not RP. 40 billion as charged with judges. The confession was transferred by Ariyanto when he was witnessing the trial of the bribery case of the defendant of the corporate Migor in the Central Jakarta Corruption Court, Wednesday (8/27/2025). Ariyanto is the man of lawyer Marcella Santoso. Ariyanto and Marcella were also suspects in the case of bribery of the freelance condemnation given by Judge Djuyamto et al against the defendant of the Wilmar Group Corporation, Permata Hijau Group and the Mas group season. The prosecutor initially read the minutes of exam (BAP) Ariyanto regarding attempts to make the corporations try to get a freelance sentence in the Migor case. Ariyanto confirmed the contents of the BAP. “There is a question here,” that the note writes there, remember if he missed, not a budget of RP 60 billion, we are polyx (fulfilled). Is the gift of money to the Central Jakarta District Court Judges suspects Arif, Djuyamto, Agam, and the suspect Ali Muhtarom with the intention that there is a decision of a joint decision? ‘Answered by the Witness’ Yes, I can explain the gift of the Central Jakarta District Court, Djuyamto, Agam and the suspect Ali Muhtarom, with the intention that there is a laughter decision with a joint will, Wahyu Gunawan, and Muhammad Arif Nuryanta’. “Yes, sir, Ariyanto replied. Witness means ‘standard because the amount was not suitable’ right, RP. 60 billion, which was supposed to be handed RP. 60 billion was not up to 60 billion rp. Well, like the Wahyu’s statement?” (Billion), only RP. Ariyanto said the term ‘welcome drink’ is the term he gave, while Wahyu calls it the term ‘read the file’. There is a term used, the money the witness gives to the revelation is the money the file reads, with the same object, one, the money that is reading file, one, the welcome drink. It is according to the witness and the term according to the recipient who read the money, (USD) according to RP. 15 thousand, less than RP. 100 million, “Ariyanto replied. Ariyanto claimed to hand over 60 billion RP 60 billion to Wahyu for dealing with the Migor case. He admitted that there was still a surrender in the form of” welcome drink “money.” I said that RP. 60 billion was clear, only the money was read the file. Please, “the prosecutor said.” When it comes to reading money, it’s conditions, sir, “Ariyanto replied. The ‘welcome drink’ applies to the value of RP 75 million judges took over the question and answer. The judge asked Ariyanto to convert the value of the money to Rupia. Ariyanto said his value was about RP.” The question of the question is 5,000. Effendi. Ariyanto said the purchase was canceled. “The one who ordered tickets for Bali Golf purchases, Wahyu asked the witness, so that. Then the witness asked Titin to buy, it was bought? ‘ Ask the prosecutor. “As far as I know, what was bought to be replaced, it was rebuilt, sir, as far as I know,” Ariyanto replies. The prosecutor asked the reason for the cancellation of the ticket. Ariyanto said the cancellation was carried out on the initiative of Marcella Santoso. “Not compensated, tickets purchased are repaid, what is the cause? Not compensated, I didn’t mention the compensation. Cancellation, refunded ticket What is the cause?” Ask the prosecutor. “This is on Marcella’s initiative, perhaps in Marcella’s record, there is no plot behind the normal trial,” Ariyanto replied. In the accusation of the prosecutor, from a total bribe of RP 40 billion, Arif was charged with receiving a portion of the RP. Wahyu received 15.7 billion RP 2.4 billion, Djuyamto received a portion of RP 9.5 billion, and Agam and Ali each received 6.2 billion RP. (YGS/YGS)