Taiwan prohibits his institutions to use "deep cick" instruments for artificial intelligence

Taiwan prevented all its government agencies and vital infrastructure providers from using the Chinese Deepseek technology in the field of artificial intelligence, due to safety issues. The ministry of digital affairs, who enjoys self -role, said in a statement on Friday: “Its operation (ie deeply ill) involves safety issues, such as transferring data across the border and leaking information.” In January, Deep Seck introduced a new open -source platform for artificial intelligence that could simulate human logic, which sparked anxiety and panic internationally for its clear competitiveness with the world -tone artificial intelligence robots. “Deep Seck” reveals what the US artificial intelligence companies have neglected and developed the ‘deeply sick’ model and apparently trained in a small part of the cost of competitive platforms, which suggests that advanced applications for artificial intelligence can be created without major investments in the devices. The free application – which has the same name for the business – has also gained global fame to conquer the download of mobile devices in many countries. Obstacles on the “Deep Seck” road, but obstacles have begun to appear in the growth of “Deep Seck”, as governments and businesses study the potential archeology of cyber security and the possibility of sharing data and other information that is in Hangzhou – with the Chinese government. The Privacy Regulatory Authority in Italy banned the application, and the UK issued a warning to its citizens and businesses, while the US Pentagon limited access to it. Hundreds of companies, including law firms, have also prevented their employees from reaching the “deeply sick” tools. Read more: The UK warns against ‘Deep Cick’, but without the ban, the ministry of digital services in Taiwan said that no official or secret information should be used while dealing with ‘Deep Cick’, given the Chinese origin. “This is a producer who jeopardizes national information security.”