'Physical relationships ensured by marriage', the woman who pleaded in SC, made Judge Saheb important remarks - rape cases false promise of marriage wife PD in the Supeme Court that former fiancé physical relationships made by promising marriages

The Supreme Court heard a case of sexual harassment on Wednesday. A petition was filed on behalf of a woman that her former fiancé assured her that she would marry her. That’s why he had sex with fiancé. However, the boy refused to get married. On this, the court made important remarks about the woman. Digital Desk, New -Delhi. The Supreme Court on Wednesday made an important remark while hearing the case of sexual harassment. The court said that the unsuccessful romantic relationship does not always mean that sexual relationships were created by force on the two sides. In fact, a woman filed a petition that her former fiancé had sex with her by promising her. The girl argued in court that she hoped the boy would marry her so that she had sexual relationships. The spirit of morality among the youth is separated: the court during the trial of the petition said that the woman is an adult. It is not possible that you are cheated by convincing you that you will get married. The concept of morality, virtues among youth are separated today. If we agree with you, any relationship between boy and girl at the university will be punishable. ‘The court also said that such complaints are sometimes inspired by orthodox morality and values, in which the man is blamed for’ defects’ in the system. What is the argument that the woman’s lawyer is raised by the woman’s lawyer, the lawyer has been raised. And it was not ‘romantic’, so the question of ‘consent’ arises. to “social taboo”. The woman argued that the woman felt that if she would not marry her, she would not marry her. He told the court: ‘It can be a conditional sex for her, but not for the woman. It is. NyayayaMurthy Sundaresh asked: ‘I also have a daughter (yet) if she is in this position, I have to see in a larger perspective. The court eventually ruled that she would hear further about the person’s petition. Also read: The right to set the interest rate at the courts has done the Supreme Court 52 years of legitimate battles, every latest news around the country and the world, every moment you will download,