New turn came in BMW car accident, the Supreme Court expanded the judicial oversight of Gaganpreet until September 27, will be heard on bail

The hearing is in the Patiala House Court in Delhi in the famous BMW accident case in Dhaulakuan, Delhi. After two days of judicial supervision, Gaganpreet was produced again today, where the court expanded judicial custody until September 27. The next trial on Gaganpreet’s bail petition will be held on Saturday, September 20. The accused Gaganpreet Kaur’s lawyer Nikhil Kohli gave arguments and sought bail for his client. Questions were also asked about the police in Delhi. The lawyer asked that when Gaganpreet was sent to judicial custody, Delhi police had to ask why section 304 (a) was not made? Police have converted the accident case to section 304 (BNS 105) of the IPC. Police deliberately imposed 304, providing for life imprisonment. According to Gagandeep, when I was arrested, a fir was submitted after ten hours, both of my children were also in the car, an ambulance also came from there. But she didn’t stop, even after she saw it. He is not guilty. Gaganpreet’s lawyer’s arguments Gaganpreet’s attorney argued that police say why Gagandeep took the car 20 km away, so that Article 304 was imposed. At the time of the accident, the BMW car was in the car, driver Gaganpreet, driver Gulfam, man Parikshit Kakkar, 4 -year -old boy and maid. After the accident, when Gaganpreet Navjot and his wife were taken to the hospital, the child and husband were sent elsewhere. We have full sympathy for the victim. Navjot hit the bus at the time of the accident, that the bus should also be caught. There must also be action against the ambulance that refused to go. Listen, the arguments of the Delhi police, Patiala House, issued a notice about the petition of Gaganpreet Kaur. Gaganpreet’s attorney demanded that the CCTV cameras be kept safe. Delhi police also informed the court of the incident. According to Delhi police, Gaganpreet was not as injured as said. He was admitted to a distant hospital, it took a long time to get there. According to police, the driver of the taxi he was taken made a statement that when he was repeatedly asked to take him to the nearby hospital, Gaganpreet did not listen to him. The attorney of Navjot’s family, the arguments of the lawyer of the Navjot family, said the rule is to take the injured to a close hospital. She was laid on a stretcher and the woman who took her children out of the car, who looked right, was admitted to the ICU. There was a base hospital ahead, but why was it not taken? The speed of the car was so fast that BMW overturned and the airbags also opened. The next trial on Gaganpreet’s bail petition will be held on Saturday, September 20.