So the crime will have to run fireworks in the country? Advocates' arguments about fireworks in SC

So the crime will have to run fireworks in the country? Incredible arguments of fireworks in the Supreme Court, Judge said- last updated: 04 April 2025, 08:10 IST Supreme Court Ban on Fire Cracker: The Supreme Court refused to remove lifelong ban on Delhi NCR firewers. The lawyer who appears for the owners of the fireworks said that the livelihoods of the people are affected. On their side … Read more what the Supreme Court said about the prohibition of fireworks? The ban on the High Court on Fire Cracker: The Supreme Court on Thursday maintained its decision on Firecrackers. The court refused to change the permanent ban on fireworks in the National Capital (NCR). The Cracker manufacturers moved the court and demanded that the ban on fireworks be limited in Delhi-NCR. Let us tell you that Delhi and Haryana have already banned the online sale of fireworks. The court also ordered Uttar Pradesh and Rajasthan to do so within two weeks. However, the court rejected, and the court, however, said that this ban was “absolutely necessary” in light of “severe” air quality in Delhi-NCR. Cracker manufacturers must be sent to a temporary ban for 3-4 months or at least allowed or claimed green fireworks to limit this ban only to Delhi. However, he said that the livelihoods of the people associated with it are affected. Not just the issue of lifting the ban, Justice Abhay S. A Bank of Oka and Justice Ujjal Bhuiyan heard the case. He said that ‘the ban is only in Delhi-NCR. Restricting the ban for several months will reach no purpose, as fireworks will be stored even after the ban. There is no question of removing the ban until the pollution by fireworks is minimized. The court emphasized that every citizen has the right to live in clean and free air. The court said: ‘The usual man cannot buy air purifiers in the house and office, a large number of people live on the street. Article 21 contains the right to health and the right to live in pollution -free environment. Since 2018, much has changed in Delhi, senior lawyer Aparajita Singh, who is protesting with the court, said that the quality of the air reaches dangerous levels around Deepawali. Senior lawyer Ans Nadkarni on behalf of the manufacturers cited the decision of the Supreme Court of October 23, 2018, allowing community green fireworks. But the court said that the 2018 decision was in the context of the entire India and not for the special status of Delhi-NCR. The court said: ‘Many have changed to 2018. In light of the extraordinary situation of Delhi, we imposed this ban. The Hindu religion protection group also opposed the ban on the pollution of the burns. He claims that crackers are not the cause of pollution. In 1985, the group questioned the pill submitted by attorney activist MC Mehta. The group claims that Mehta has received funds from an international organization that supports ‘NAXAL activities’. The court rejected this petition. Location: New -delhi, Delhi first published: 04 April 2025, 08:10 IST Honeyyneasation will be cracked in the country? Advocates’ arguments about fireworks in SC