WAQF LAW: Differences between Muslim organizations on the interim decision of the Supreme Court - NCR WAQF Law Discord Muslim groups divided on the decision of the Supreme Court

Updated: Di, 16 Sep 2025 12:05 am (IST) The Waqf Amendment Act 2025 has differences between Muslim organizations regarding the Supreme Court’s interim order. Aimplb expressed dissatisfaction while Jamiat Ulema-e-Hind welcomed. The objections of Muslim organizations are on the appointment of WAQF by users and non-Muslims. Aimplb will continue with the protest. The VHP welcomed the order and said that the spirit of the law remains intact. Correspondent, New -Delhi. In the WAQF (Amendment Act) Act 2025 case, differences emerged in the country’s top Muslim organizations on the interim order of the Supreme Court. While expressing dissatisfaction with the verdict, the All India Muslim Personal Legal Council (Aimplb) described it as incomplete and unsatisfactory, while Jamiat Ulema-Hind president Maulana Arshad Madani. Remove the ad, just read the news. At the same time, Vishwa Hindu Parishad (VHP) also welcomed the interim order and said that it would uphold the spirit, purpose and functioning of the new law. By the way, the most important objection of Muslim organizations is about maintaining the provision of WAQF by the user and the appointment of non-Muslims to the council. Which AIMPLB announced to continue the protest movement across the country and hold a big rally at Ramlila Maidan in Delhi on November 16. In a statement, Madani thanked the Supreme Court for the interim order, saying that the court had taken the concern and serious concern that Muslims across the country raised over the parts of the new law seriously and placed an interim restriction on three of them. He also said that his struggle is not over yet. Jamiat will continue his democratic struggle until the law is canceled. At the same time, IMPB spokesman Qasim Rasul Ilyas said the court had given partial relief, but that widespread constitutional concerns were not resolved, which is disappointing. Therefore, protests will continue. James-e-Islami Vice President Malik Mohtasim Khan said the Muslim community is not satisfied with this decision. Because many provisions of the law violate equality and the right to religious freedom. The provision to place non-Muslims on the board is more worrying. At the same time, the VHP International President Alok Kumar welcomes the court order and says that the need for the following Islam for the property that was not removed was stopped until the rules were made. Similarly, the court did not prohibit the provision not to ruin public property, simply given the tribunal the right to hear the dispute case.