Prosecutor asked Hasto: PDIP's decision at that time was my best framework?

Jakarta -Hasto Kristiyanto, secretary of the PDIP, was questioned as a defendant in the alleged bribery case of Inter -time (PAW) bribery for the DPR members Harun Masiku and investigative pioneers. The prosecutor asked if Harun was the best cadre, and it was decided by the PDIP DPP to receive the delegation of Nazarudin Germas. The prosecutor initially asked about the attitude the PDIP DPP took during the plenary meeting related to the delegation of the votes of Nazarudin Germas who received the most votes in the election district 1 from South Sumatra (South Sumatra). The defendant’s exam was held at Jakarta Corruption Court on Thursday (6/26/2025). “The request for this essential test was issued by the Supreme Court, is it true that the PDIP DPP held another meeting to discuss related to the decision of this Supreme Court?” Ask the KPK prosecutor. Browse to continue with the content “right”, Hasto replies. The prosecutor investigated the results of the decision on the meeting made by the PDIP DPP. The prosecutor asked Hasto if Harun is the best cadre, so it was determined to receive the delegation of Nazarudin’s voice. “What were the results of meeting the meeting at the time?” Ask the prosecutor. ‘The results of the meeting meeting are also in July to ask the KPU to implement the results of the Supreme Court’s judicial review, of which the ruling is also attached. Then another decision said that the DPP PDI Perjuangan said the Mason Masu brother the Mr. Nazarudin germas replaced. The deleg of the PDI -PDI was exactly. “So the decision of the leadership of a political party has determined the best framework?” Harun as the recipient of Nazarudin’s voice transfer. First set my mirror as the best framework, like that? “Asked the prosecutor.” That, nothing, “Hasto replied.” Huh? “Says the prosecutor.” Because the best framework is a term determined by a judicial review. It therefore immediately determines on the basis of the consideration that my brother’s brother has obtained a scholarship from Queen Elizabeth, and then the international economic law is determined by my brother’s brother to Mr. To replace Nazarudin Germas. Hasto emphasized that there was no sound of Harun’s decision as the best framework in the PDIP DPP meeting. He said the results of meeting the meeting determined Harun as the recipient of Nazarudin’s voice, and did not use the term as the best framework. “If the meaning of the decision is the best framework, but there is no decision that my mission is the best framework. There is no such decision, which is only the framework of Harun Masu, is determined as a substitute,” Hasto said. “Aaron Masu was determined as a framework that received a delegation of votes from Nazarudin Kiemas?” Ask the prosecutor. “That’s right,” Hasto replied. “Then the second decision is that the DPP immediately sends a letter to the KPU to carry out a judicial review decision like that right?” Ask the prosecutor. “Yes, that’s right,” Hasto replied. The KPK previously charged Hasto in the investigation into the investigation into the alleged bribery case with the suspect Harun Masiku. It is said that Hasto prevented the KPK from arresting my Masal Aaron, who has been a refugee since 2020. Hasto has been charged with the bribe of former KPU commissioner Wahyu Setiawan RP. 600 million. The prosecutor said the bribe received that Wahyu Setiawan had taken care of the determination of members of the DPR 2019-2024 Harun Masu (PAW) determination (PAW). Hasto was charged with giving bribes with his reliable people, Donny Tri Istiqomah and Saful Bahri, then Mason Masiku at the time. Donny has now been nominated as a suspect, then Saful Bahri was convicted and my mission is still a refugee. (MIB/YGS) HOEGENG Awards 2025 Read the inspiring story of the exemplary police candidate here