RAJEHTAN: The accused convicted of charges of being acquitted, the ruling expressed the ruling in the absence of evidence – Rajasthan Supreme Court allowed Govt employees in corruption case in the allegation of the bribes demand

According to the complainant, Kamal Mena demanded a bribe from two thousand to three thousand rupees. A case was registered against the accused and investigation was conducted. After this, the charges were drawn up against the accused and the case began. The court acknowledged that the prosecution did not prove his point and that he did not give enough evidence against the accused in the case. Jnn, Jodhpur. In the ruling given by Rajasthan High Court Judge Manoj Kumar Garg in a ruling on 03.02.2020 of the special judge, Sessions Court (Prevention of Corruption Act), Udaipur, Kamal Mena, was convicted by the charge of Article 7 of the Prevention of the Corruption, 1988. Clawu-Nathu Lal (PW-2) given a written complaint to additional police superintendent ACB Rajsamand, claiming that when he went to the office to deposit the fixed amount for electricity connections for his agricultural land, he was Kamal Mena, J. and asked to contact. According to the complainant, Kamal Mena demanded a bribe from two thousand to three thousand rupees. Based on this complaint, the ACB began an investigation and laid a trap, but the accused did not accept the bribe and later sent a message from friends that he had made a mistake and that no steps should be taken. In light of this incident, a case was registered against the accused and investigation was conducted. After this, the charges were drawn up against the accused and the case began. The court drafted the charges against the accused in terms of section 7 of the Corruption Prevention Act, but no concrete evidence was presented against the accused during the hearing. The complainant denied the allegations of the claim for bribery in testimony and became hostile witnesses. No evidence found against the allegation. In addition, the bribes of the accused or any evidence were not seized, so that the charge on the accused could be proved. The court acknowledged that the prosecution did not prove his point and that he did not give enough evidence against the accused in the case. The Inter -High Court ended the ruling to convince the accused by the lower court and to convince the accused of corruption charges. Also read: The anti -corruption team in UP, taking a bribe of 10 thousand, government employees have arrested Rangheath, every big news from your city, now on your phone. Download the most reliable companion of Local News Afjagran Local App.