Rules that are ignored in the evaluation of copies in JPSC will be heard on November 10 in the Supreme Court - rules ignored during the evaluation of copies in the JPSC trial as assistance in the Supreme Court on November 10

Updated: Mon, 06 Oct 2025 06:22 PM (IST) in the JPSC main investigation in the Jharkhand High Court, was heard during an appeal request against the evaluation of copies of the language -based topic. The applicants told the court that the JPSC itself ignored the rules in evaluating the copies of the language topic. Age evaluated the copies of the Bell -based teachers. On November 10, the State Bureau, Ranchi, filed on the petition for the evaluation of copies in JPSC. In the court of the Jharkhand High Court, Tarlok Singh Chauhan and Justice Rajesh Shankar, an appeal request was heard against the evaluation of the topics of the language -based topic in the main investigation of JPSC. The date of November 10 was set for a detailed trial in the case. Advocate Kumar Harsh told the court on behalf of the applicants that the JPSC itself made a rule that the copies of the language topic would only be assessed by the teachers who have at least ten years of teaching experience. Remove ads just read the news, while five years of experience are compulsory for alternative topics. Nevertheless, the commission ignored its own rules and evaluated copies of Bell -based teachers. Whose teaching experience is only one and a half years. This process is completely against the rules. In such a situation, it is necessary to cancel the copies by canceling the results of the main investigation so that justice can be done to the qualified candidates. Proponents Sanjay Piparwal and Prince Kumar told the Court on behalf of JPSC that the allegations of the requester are unfounded. He said that the rules were equal to all the candidates and that the file challenged the rules after failing to fail the exam. If they objected, they should have imposed an objection to the time of the rules. It was also notified by JPSC that the single bank rejected this petition. Therefore, the current appeal petition must also be rejected. Please tell that an appeal has been filed on behalf of Rajesh Prasad and others in the Supreme Court.