Said the Ago about the former attorney -general for suggesting Amicus Curiae Praperans Nadiem

Jakarta -Former Attorney General Marzuki Darusman with 11 other figures, including the former KPK leader, presented Amicus Curiae during the pre -trial of the former Minister of Education and Culture of Nadiem Makarim. The Attorney General (ago) office said it was the personal right of Marzuki and his party respected it. ‘Continue if there is a court friend or Amicus curiae, and he is sure to understand the extent of the preliminary scope. As regulated in the Criminal Procedure Act, the material of the preliminary scope and the decision of the Constitutional Court is also not included in the subject of the case, “Kapus -Penkum Attorney -General Anang Supriatna said Saturday (4/10/2025). “What the participation of Mr. Marzuki Darusman, former Yes and several former KPK leaders, still respect and respect his personal rights, he is not on behalf of the institution,” Anang added. Browse to continue with the content that Anang ensures that investigators have strong evidence related to the determination of suspects of Nadiem Makarim in the case of alleged corruption in obtaining Chromebook shooters. “But what is clear is that the round building investigators were very careful about establishing someone as a suspect. Supported by strong evidence and legal facts, and went through a mechanism for exposure mechanism,” he said. 12 First, the first promongs as Amicus Curiae were previously reported, as many as 12 figures were voluntary as Amicus Curiae in the Nadim Makarim pre -trial. The request was filed in the first session of Nadiem’s ​​forerunner at the South Jakarta District Court on Friday (3/10/2025). Researchers at the Arsil Arsil’s Judicial Independence (Leip) Study and Advocacy Institute and Transparency International Natalia Soebagjo members read the request in court. “Amicus Curiae is intended to provide input to the noble presidential judge regarding important issues that must be investigated in the preliminary process regarding the validity of determining someone as a suspect,” Arsil said. Arsil said that ten other figures were unable to deliver the Amicus Curiae directly to the hearing. He said Amicus Curiae is not only meant for the forerunner of Nadim, but also a precursor to the determination of suspects in general. “This legal opinion is not specifically aimed at this case, but also for the provisional investigation into the determination of suspects in general for maintaining the principle of fair trial in law enforcement in Indonesia,” he said. Arsil said his party did not ask the judge to award or reject the forerunner of Nadim. Amicus Curiae, he continued, was transferred to how the preliminary process should have tried someone. (Ond/Zap)