A Suggestion 1 Person 1 Account appeared on each social media

Jakarta – A proposal emerged that one citizen had only one social media account on each platform. This proposal was transferred so that social media was not used by the buzzer. As is known, this proposal is not actually the new proposal. There were members of the DPR who suggested the same thing last July. He is a member of the House of Representatives Commission I, by SOH. He considered the second account or a second account on social media (social media) as worrying because it was abused. By suggesting the use of the second account’s social account, it is prohibited. Browse to continue with content “over double accounts, sir. Both on YouTube, on Instagram, in Tiktok. This double account is very, very destructive, sir. This multiple account is eventually abused. In the end, not bringing benefits to the community, for the original users of course,” Panja with the general audience, with Google, with Google, with Google, with Google, with Google, with Google, with Google, with Google, with Google, Jakarta, Tuesday (7/15/2025). Through SOH, assessed that the second account on social media is a threat, despite the benefit of social media businesses. This PKB -Legilasor illustrates the case of constituencies or buzzers using the second account to attack someone. “Although on the other hand, it can be profitable for the multiple account platform. But generally 100% I think this double account actually becomes a threat and even damage,” the PKB legislature said. The latest secretary of the Indonesian Parliament Gerindra Party Faction Bambang Haryadi suggested that one citizen has only 1 social media account for each social media platform. Bambang mentioned this idea to avoid anonymous accounts or false accounts. It was transferred by Bambang Haryadi during the door stop journalist session in the parliamentary complex, Senayan, Jakarta, Thursday (12/9). Bambang Haryadi answered questions about wild issues on social media in which Rahayu Saraswati Djojohadicumo President Prabowo subiantto-Postponies of the Indonesian Parliament was named for the minister’s seat. “So we understand that social media is really very open and difficult; any problem can be done there. Sometimes we also have to be careful to respond to social media issues,” Bambang Haryadi said. “In fact, we argue that in the future it is also necessary to be an integrated account single so that each citizen can only have one account on each social media platform. We learn from Switzerland, for example, one citizen has only one phone number, because the phone number is integrated with government assistance facilities, social media and others,” he said. Bambang said the information transferred on social media should be accounted for. He emphasizes the phenomenon of anonymous and buzzer accounts, also known as commuting, which recently appears in various social media. “We understand that the era of social media is very brutal, sometimes the issue is not right, sometimes eaten with roast in such a way that it affects groups that are actually rational groups,” he said. To suppress the number of buzzer Bambang Haryadi emphasized that this proposal was not democracy, but that the voice of society echoed through social media was the right voice of the citizens themselves. Not an anonymous account or buzzer aimed at framing conditions for the benefit of the group. It is part of the form of improving the quality of democracy as the development of social media era. Bambang argued, the idea he meant was that one citizen had one account in each type of platform, not one person had only one social media account. For example, Bambang explained, people can have 1 Instagram account, 1 Tiktok account, 1 Facebook account, 1 WhatsApp account and other social media accounts. One person cannot have 2 Instagram accounts, 2 Tiktok accounts, and so on. “So we think that it hopefully does not limit democracy in the future, but we should not mix it with freedom of social media in the future, are used to do negative framework for people per person or institution,” he said. “And to avoid the rise of false accounts, it is necessary to evaluate and enforce strict verification. So that there are no data from other people used to create an anonymous account,” Bambang added. Bambang also talked about anonymous accounts. According to him, the anonymous accounts are not to commit crimes. “In addition to being vulnerable to setting up problems, these anonymous stories are also widely used to commit crimes. Many people are deceived to buy goods, and some are even deceived,” he concluded. Narliswandi Iwan Piliang banned an anonymous version of activists on social media, and responded to Bambang. Iwan claims to agree with the proposal. “Yesterday, Pak Bambang Haryadi, secretary of the Gerindra faction in the DPR, suggested we have a social media account platform. I was a long day when Twitter, now X, appeared, long ago that each of us had one account, not even anonymous,” Iwan said in a video statement to report on Friday (12/9/2925). Iwan said, without regulations related to a person’s account limits, it would bear a robot account that disrupted public communication. Iwan emphasized the phenomenon of the current Bot account. “But in essence, that every person on the platform, without regulations of the state, can ultimately be born anonymous robots that disturb the basic spirits of public communication. The basic spirit of public communication is conscience, reason and thoughts,” Iwan said. The director of the development of state film production (PFN) said the identity of users on social media should be clear. He supported the idea of ​​Bambang Haryadi. “So I support what was initiated by Mr Bambang Hariadi to make a by -law that one platform, one social media account, with a clear identity, with a clear mobile number, a clear Nik, support,” he added. (RDP/RDP)