SC: Make a case of sexual harassment part of bio -data against the vice -chancellor, the Supreme Court has instructed - the Supreme Court orders the Vice -Chancellor of the University to mention in its resume

Updated: Sun, 14 Sep 2025 07:07 am (IST) The Supreme Court said it could be appropriate to forgive the mistake that makes the mistake but should not forget the mistake. The Supreme Court ordered the Supreme Court that his decision was related to the allegations of sexual harassment on the vice -chancellor of a university, should become part of his biodata, so that it always plagued him, even if the complaint was dismissed for the deadline. Make a case of sexual harassment part of the bio-data part of the Supreme Court Pti, New Delhi. The Supreme Court said it could be appropriate to forgive the mistake that makes the mistake, but the mistake should not be forgotten. The Supreme Court ordered the Supreme Court to be related to the allegations of sexual harassment on the vice -chancellor of a university, part of his biodata, so that it was always harassed, even if the complaint was dismissed due to the fact that he was outside the deadline. Remove advertisement, just read the news, in 2023 a case against the vice -chancellor, a bank of Justice Pankaj Mittal and Justice Prasanna B. Varale filed on Friday, transferred this order to the petition of a faculty member of a university in Bengal. The faculty member filed a complaint in December 2023 in which he accused the vice -chancellor of sexual harassment. The Apex Court said that the Calcutta High Court bank made no legal mistake with the restoration of the decision of the Local Complaints Committee (LCC), saying that the deadline for the complaint to be filed by the appellant and that the complaint could be rejected. The error made against the appellant said it could be appropriate to forgive the error that makes the mistake, but the error should not be forgotten. The error made against the appellant cannot be investigated on technical grounds, but should not forget. The bank rejected the appeal against the Supreme Court’s order and said that the decision should become part of the Bio -data of Defendant Number One, which he must secure personally. What was the case, in December 2023, the appellant filed a formal complaint accusing the vice -chancellor of sexual harassment at LCC. The alleged incident occurred in April 2023, while the complaint was filed on December 26, 2023, which was not only outside the scheduled three -month period, but also outside the expandable six -month limit. The victim approached the Supreme Court after being rejected by LCC.