Sonam Wangchuk and his wife made serious allegations against the Jodhpur jail, the superintendent of the jail said - they are talking wrong.

The ongoing trial in the Supreme Court over the supervision of environmental conservationist Sonam Wangchuk left Jodhpur Central prison administration in a dilemma. Wangchuk and his wife Geetanjali made serious allegations against the prison administration. Geetanjali told the court that when she visited her husband on October 7 and 11, their talks were monitored. A DCP and a lady constable sat next to him and also took pictures of his personal legal documents. Geetanjali called it a violation of her fundamental rights. Gitanjali, transported vehicles, also claimed that she was not allowed to move freely in Jodhpur. IB and Rajasthan police have jailed in curtain vehicles. He said it violated his constitutional rights (Articles 19 and 21). Wangchuk also filed an affidavit in the Supreme Court on October 13 asking questions about the prison facilities and treatment. The answer of the prison Superintendent’s reply in prison, Pradeep Lakhawat, denied the allegations by filing an affidavit in court. He said that Wangchuk was kept in a 20×20 standard Barrack, which is not seclusion. Wangchuk is alone in these barracks, but he got the same rights as other prisoners. Lakhawat said Wangchuk asked for a laptop on October 10, which was given to him on October 12, although it was not allowed under the prison rules. Photocopies of important documents were also given. Allegations and anti -abuses between the two parties claim that the prison administration that all rules were followed and Wangchuk receives legal advice. However, the serious allegations made by Wangchuk and his wife asked questions about the operation of the prison administration. Share this story -tags