Supreme Court has remained the policy on ground pool in Punjab, now the Supreme Court will go to the government? - Punjab Haryana Supreme Court remains ground pool policy will go to the Supreme Court Government

The Punjab and Haryana High Court banned the ground pool policy for a month, after which a debate in the bureaucracy arose. The government began taking legal advice to challenge the ruling in the Supreme Court. Officials believe that the Land Procurement Act has not been followed and that there is no plan to rehabilitate the workers. Instrapreet Singh, Chandigarh. Since the Punjab and Haryana High Court for banned the ground pool policy for a month, there has been a debate in the bureaucracy on this matter. At the same time, the government also began consulting legal experts to contest the Supreme Court decision in the Supreme Court. It is said that even today there was a meeting between the general secretary Kap Sinha and the general secretary of the Department of Housing Vikas Garg, although the details of this meeting were not found. The Supreme Court imposed a month’s ban, the points for which the policy of ground pool was banned for one month was also debated in the bureaucracy. Officials believe that the Land Acquisition Act 2013 made it compulsory to have a social impact of the place before obtaining land, so why was it not done with the implementation of this policy? A Housing Department official said that when this policy is voluntary, why is the need for social impact study? A senior officer argued that when the government suffered the work to get a social impact study, the Malwa channel, the Guru Nanak Dev university in which very little land should be taken, why is it not done under the scheme to take 65 thousand hectares of land? He said that farmers who have land will get residential and business places in exchange for their land. If they also sell private builders, they can buy land somewhere else with the money they get, but what will happen to the laborers who depend on this country? Where are they going? The government has drafted a plan to set them up. In addition, there is no provision for whose farmer will take this policy. In such a situation, it was certain that the Supreme Court would stop this policy. Another senior official said that when the land acquisition of parliament is a law, why the policy of ground pool? In such a situation, what is the justification for the laws adopted in Parliament or the Legislative Assembly, if the Act is implemented and implemented by establishing a policy. The ground pool policy was brought in 2012-13, a former home secretary said that the farmers also got the option when the land pool policy was introduced in 2012-13, the farmers also received the option, along with the plot that they would receive money under the law on the basis of their land. So there was never a dispute about this policy. But it is the biggest obstacle in the current policy that the government has given no option to give the price of land.