Sunjay Kapur Heritage War: Bank Account Empty, Claim Children; Judge says NDA is demanding ‘problematic’ – what we know

Sunjay Kapur Heritage War: The money that Sunjay Kapur left in the bank account announced in the late businessman’s alleged will was ‘wiped off’, and his ex-wife Karisma Kapur’s children claimed amid a continuous Heritage Court in Delhi. Karisma Kapoor’s children Samaira Kapur and Kiaan Raj Kapur challenged their father Sunjay Kapur’s alleged will and sought shares in his assets. The claims were made on Thursday when the court heard a plea of ​​Kapur’s widow Priya Sachdev. During the hearing, the Delhi HC Priya Sachdev’s appeal for Samaira, Kiaan and Sunjay Kapur’s mother Rani Kapur to disclose an agreement (NDA) to reveal the businessman’s assets. The court noted that the submission of the list of personal assets and obligations of the late Sunjay Kapur could be “problematic” in a sealed coverage, as she has two children with former wife and actor Karisma Kapoor has a “right to question the assets disclosed.” Justice Jyoti Singh made the observation when Priya Sachdev displaced the appeal that also demanded that the documents be submitted in a sealed coverage with the parties to be bound by confidentiality, or in the alternative, Constitution of Confidentiality Club. ‘Allowing the application can be problematic for the simple reason that they, as the alleged beneficiary of the estate, (Karisma’s children Samaira Kapur and Kiaan Raj Kapur) have the right to disclose the assets. So, tomorrow, if they have to verify and ask what they will ever defend, the Judge asks. Why does Priya Sachdev want an NDA? Priya Sachdev’s application comes after the Delhi HC’s order on September 10, which ordered her to submit an extensive statement from Sanjay Kapur’s assets and charges on June 12. She insisted that the requirement was required, referring to the attention of the media and the demand for cyber security. Her lawyer said she did not “shoot” from the details to the plaintiffs. However, Samaan’s and Kiaan’s lawyer argued that the bank accounts mentioned in the will have been eradicated. “Our information is that bank (accounts) have been wiped … For properties, the world must know … How will I confirm the transactions (if sealed coverage and confidentiality clause for coverage of the coverage and confidentiality clause)?” The child lawyer said. While seeking confidentiality, Priya’s lawyer claims to be a matter of safety. ‘There are banking details, other financial details. Why should the public have someone’s bank account number? ‘ The lawyer asked and claimed that ‘press conferences’ were held after the hearing. The court will resume the hearing on the case on Friday.

Exit mobile version