Youtuber Jyoti Malhotra: Will YouTubers and Infictors be liable? The question arose after Jyoti Malhotra Detective Scandal - Jyoti Malhotra Pakistani spying case that regulates YouTubers and influencers

The demand for accountability and regulatory monitoring of YouTubers and influencers on social media is increased following the arrest of Jyoti Malhotra on charges of spying. Inflators affect crores of people in the country and abroad, but there is no control over it. It spreads misleading information and can become a threat to national security. The government and society will have to pay attention to this. Jagran correspondent, New -Delhi. In the midst of emerging resentment across the country against Pakistan and its allies Turki and Azerbaijan, the spy episode of Utrbi Malhotra, which is popular in the social media world, has put the people of the country. It is also warned that the abuse of digital forums by some YouTubers and influencers on social media has reached a very dangerous level. Where he is also ready to jeopardize the interests of the country. Meanwhile, 33 -year -old traveler of Hisar, Haryana, YouTuber Jyoti Malhotra, was arrested on Saturday for playing in India for Pakistan, who traveled to several countries, including Pakistan and the YouTube video. How many followers do you have Malhotra? Jyoti Malhotra has more than eight Lakh followers on YouTube, Facebook and Instagram. With his arrest, his name continued on social media. It also traded on Sunday. With the arrest of Jyoti Malhotra, there was a flood of posts that expressed concern in the virtual world. By the way, this is not the first case. Before that, there were many controversies in the headings, in which the latest case of Ranveer Allahabadia was very controversial about the India, the latent show about the highlight of pornography. In which dirty things happen. Its performances were often in controversies. Similarly, • Elvish Yadav – Snake’s Position in Party Case, • Sandeep Maheshwari vs Vivek Bindra Controversy – Question on Immoral Morals, • Carrie Minati vs Tickets Episode – Promoting toxic online environment, • Gaurav Taneja (Flying Beast) – Gaurav Taneja (Flying Beast) is, whose performances are controversies, which poison society. BJP -LP of Chandni Chowk and the National Secretary of Confederation of All India Traders (CAT), Praveen Khandelwal, says that the platforms that were for creativity and mass media are already a promotion, wrong information, targeted oppression and political agenda instruments, and all this happens in the name ‘freedom of expression’. He goes on to say that “is it freedom of expression, or freedom of exploitation? Or even a greater threat – is it the freedom to play with the safety of the nation, as seen in the case of Jyoti Malhotra?” Khandwal says “Freedom does not mean the right to say anything, but the responsibility to protect the truth, maintain dignity and protect the nation. No person or stage can be above the laws and dignity – no one can be above national security and social harmony. Yes.” VHP launched the campaign against the Toxic Content VHP National spokesman Vinod Bansal said strict action should be taken against whose involvement in such acts. The business of such mentality must be bulls. Especially people who are public celebrity. They become a mirror to give direction to society. Then divide society and the country and compromise the country’s interest and culture. He concentrates that the VHP has launched a campaign on similar toxic content on the OTT platform. On which many platforms were banned, many OTT platforms had to remove the content and apologize. He says in such cases, the IT ministry of the central government needs monitoring and concrete actions. Society will also have to be vigilant. The demand for regulatory structure Praveen Khandwal says that the time is now needed to create a clear and binding regulatory framework for the creators and influencers of digital content. This structure should include the following statues. • Promoting brands, paid content and compulsory disclosure of political relationships • False information or grievance-affirmative system in cases of harassment • Incapability of platforms, which must act on repeated offenses • anti-national, defamatory or social activities. Is, they must treat moral and legal responsibility. The digital platform cannot be allowed to become an “arbitrary and anarchy base”. Every big news from your city, now on your phone. Download the most reliable companion of Local News Afjagran Local App.