'Sileps to recommend against the government', CJI raised questions about non -legitimate members of Tribunale -CJI flags' reluctance of tribunal members insist

Updated: Sat, 20 Sep 2025 23:30 (IST) Chief Justice Br Gawai said that some non-judicial members of tribunals hesitate to recommend against the government. He urged the members to consider the topic. He talked about various issues related to the administrative tribunal and the justice justice justice system. Legislation Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal said the need to stop the tendency of government departments to challenge court orders. Digital Desk, New -Delhi. Chief Justice Br Gawai said on Saturday that some non-judicial members of tribunals, who are usually former bureaucrats, are reluctant to accept any order against the government. He requested these members to consider the topic. Remove the advertisement just read the news, at the 10th All India conference of 2025 from the Union Administrative Tribunal (CAT), the CJI raised different issues related to the tribunals (tribunals) and the justice system in the presence of the Minister of Legislation, Arjun Ram Meghwal and the Minister of Jitra Singh at the office of the Premier. ‘Members’ Chief Justice Gawai must be trained that administrative tribunal differs from courts as they hold a special place between the executive and the judiciary, and many of their members come from administrative services, while others come from the judiciary. He said this diversity is a strength as it brings together judicial skills and administrative experience, but it is essential that members are constantly trained and followed by the same standards as suitable and behavior. ‘The nuances of the administration must be known’ ‘says” right members must be familiar with the nuances of public administration, while administrative members are mandatory to train legal arguments. Don’t take my point differently, because nowadays you don’t know what you say and what’s coming on the internet media. He said that regular workshops, conferences and training programs organized by judicial academics can be invaluable in this regard and significantly increase the effectiveness of members of the tribunals. He also emphasized the need for a uniform appointment process with clear criteria for suitability, which will eliminate arbitrary questions and strengthen the trust of citizens in the tribunal. CJI is concerned about this and has also expressed concern about the growing number of appeals against the decisions of the tribunals. He said it would have happened because the bureaucrats were afraid to take any risk and blame the courts. Jitendra Singh, Minister of State of the Union State, said there is a need to find measures to avoid unnecessary appeals in high dishes in service matters related to government officials. He has encouraged all parties involved to help Cat complete their original work, so that the number of pending issues related to the high courts can be reduced. Must limit the tendency of appeal against court orders: Meghwal Minister Arjun Ram Meghwal said there was a need to combat the tendency to challenge court orders in government departments. He said that the government departments often file an appeal, despite the courts that have been taken in concrete decisions. He indicated that officials sometimes file an appeal to challenge the orders of the court or cat to save their lives, as the decisions taken by them are questioned. Meghwal said he regularly receives files in which the central departments intend to appeal against the orders of the concrete court. He said that Cat should use the latest techniques such as e-faired and digital audience. He also appreciated the role of the tribunal in reducing the burden of cases on the Supreme Court and High Court.