'Will pull you out' Rana Sanga, SP chief Akhilesh Yadav who rages over the issue of controversy, openly threatened, watching video watching

New -delhi: A significant situation arose on the stage of ‘Amar Ujala Samvad 2025’ CONCLAVE in the capital Delhi when Samawadi Party (SP) national president and former Minister of Uttar Pradesh, Akhilesh Yadav, lost his temper. The incident happened on Friday when a person asked a question related to Rana Sanga from the stage. When he heard the question, Akhilesh Yadav became angry with anger and asked the organizers to get the person out of the auditorium. After the incident, the video went viral on social media, in which Akhilesh Yadav could be heard that was raining on the person. In the video he says: “This guy belongs to the BJP ….. I’ll get out, I’ll take it out. You’ll get you full, then I’ll tell you.” In the program, Akhilesh Yadav was invited as a speaker in the program and questions were asked about all the issues. At the same time, a listener raised a question associated with Rana Sanga, which led to the SP chief angry. He told the organizers of the stage himself that “it takes it out, it’s a BJP man.” However, as soon as the security personnel tried to get the person out of the hall, Akhilesh Yadav intervened immediately and said he should be released. The video of this whole incident is now viral on social media, and people give sharp reactions to it. Many people called it Akhilesh Yadav’s intolerance, while SP supporters described it as a conspiracy of a ‘political upheaval’. The Rana Sanga controversy again hid the roots of this entire incident in the statement that Ramji Lal Suman, Ramji Lal Suman, of the Samajwadi party gave it in parliament last month. During the Rajya Sabha session on March 21, 2025, Suman made a historical claim that “Rana Sanga was the person who invited Babur to India to defeat Ibrahim Lodi.” He further said that Rana should be considered a ‘traitor’ for this work. Suman’s statement caused earthquake in political and social circles. The Rajput community, especially the Karni Sena, regarded this statement as an attack on its pride and began to protest. Suman later defended his statement and said that he spoke on the basis of historical facts, but his ‘traitor’ remarks further annoyed the atmosphere. Karni Sena’s outrage and attack, after this statement, on March 26, 2025, Ramji Lal Suman’s home in the Agar district of Rajasthan was attacked by Karni Sena activists. Dozens of activists reached his home with bulldozers and vandalized there. According to reports, the protesters broke the windows of the house, damaged and stoned vehicles. There were many political reactions to this attack. The Samajwadi party strongly condemned the attack, while the Karni Sena retained its position and said that “insult to Rajput’s history will be tolerated under any circumstances.” Watch video here What kind of arrogant and disgraceful behavior is it? Akhilesh Yadav touches oral with the audience during Amar Ujala Conclave. Address hearing with oy, aa, sun …. throw him/them …. someone who doesn’t agree is Bhajpai and that’s the support is heard !! pic.twitter.com/p4qGyplhol – Megh Updates 🚨 ™ (@meghupdes) April 18, 2025 Why Akhilesh Yadav’s sharp response? Analysts believe that the person who asked questions during the Amar Ujala dialogue 2025 should raise any questions related to this controversy, which provoked Akhilesh Yadav. It is also feared that this question was politically provocative, whereby Akhilesh Yadav called it a conspiracy of the BJP and asked him to take out the person. Akhilesh Yadav has accused the BJP many times earlier that it is doing politics by encouraging common and ethnic feelings. Maybe in this context he asked the person to be taken out of the hall by calling the person a ‘man’. Once the video of the incident on social media on social media became viral, people began to make sharp reactions. Some people have described the language of Akhilesh Yadav as unparliamentary and anti -democracy, while some supporters justified his feelings. A Twitter user wrote: “If you ask questions about history, the reason for a quarrel is, how will the dialogue be possible?” At the same time, another user said: “In the name of common politics, when leaders begin to turn history according to their ease, similar scenes come out.” The purpose with which the stage of Amar Ujala dialogue 2025 is organized – dialogue and discourse – was transferred a moment as a result of this incident. Although the organizers handled the atmosphere, this incident again raised the question of whether or not disagreements were given a place in India’s politics? Controversion related to Rana Sanga, the statement of Ramji Lal Suman and the reaction of Karni Sena has already heated politics. Now Akhilesh Yadav’s response to the platform has given this dispute more political color. Before the upcoming election, such problems will be heated even faster, it can be considered fixed. But it also made it clear that the debate on history and identity in the politics of India is not just academic – now she has become directly part of the election strategies.