Pashupati Paras refuted on the statement of Chirag Paswan, "If there was a concern about the law and order, the issue raised in the Lok Sabha is"

Politics were now warm about the questions raised by Chirag Paswan, Minister of Union, regarding the Law and Order of Bihar. Rashtriya attracts Janshakti Party (RLJP) national president and former Union Minister Pashupati Kumar Paras refuted on Chirah’s statement. Paras spoke to Ians and said that if Chirag Paswan was so concerned about the law and order of the state, he should have raised this matter in the Lok Sabha. He also added that the public chose him as a public representative, and that Parliament is the most suitable platform to keep its words. Paras said: “The incidents of crime in Bihar are alarming, there are no two opinions, but if you are a minister in government and you have a platform, it is better than public rhetoric that you keep this topic seriously on the table of parliament.” Let me tell you that in the past, Chirag Paswan has expressed concern about the growing criminal incidents in Bihar and the state government, saying that the general public feels uncertain. After this statement, there was a stir in political circles. A look at political competition was a long political tension between Chirag Paswan and Pashupati paras. After the death of Ram Vilas Pashe, the party was divided into two factions – on the one hand there is the lure Janshakti party (Ram Vilas) of Chirag Pashe, on the other hand, the National attracts Janshakti Party (RLJP) of Pashupati Paras. The relationship between the two leaders is well known, and now Paras’ response to the statement of Chirah is linked to this link. Uncomfortable within NDA? It is noteworthy that Chirag Paswan is a minister in the current central government and is also the head of the NDA’s ally. At the same time, the party of Pashupati Paras was also a former NDA ally. In such a situation, the war between the two leaders can cause discomfort within the NDA. It will now be seen what the Chirag Paswan responds to this statement and whether this issue is limited to only an immediate political rhetoric, or it shows a major political impact on the upcoming elections in the meeting. Share this story -tags