Prior to the Bihar meeting election, Prashant Kishore and Sanjay Jaiswal's oral war, allegations and counter-abandoned

The political stir of the state intensified before the election of the 2025 meeting. Meanwhile, there was a war between Jansuraj’s architect Prashant Kishore and Dr. Sanjay Jaiswal, MP of West Champaran. The dispute has now achieved personal allegations, causing the election atmosphere to be further heated. According to the information, the debate between Prashant Kishore and Sanjay Jaiswal was initially focused on political strategies and the future election. But the recent developments have begun a round of personal allegations. The two leaders emphasized their side through the public platform and media. Political experts believe that such rhetoric is common in Bihar politics, but that the conversion of personal allegations can make the election atmosphere more stressful. Prashant Kishore, known for election strategies and public relations in state politics, recently commented on the operation of various ruling parties and opposition. They believe that only improving political processes and fair strategies can be in the public interest. At the same time, Dr. Sanjay Jaiswal, who responds to the comments of Prashant Kishore, rejected the allegations and cited his political achievements and actions. Experts believe that such an oral war before the Bihar election became a common way to influence election strategies and voter perception. Maintaining a balance between political rhetoric and personal allegations becomes challenging for leaders. It strengthens both emotional reaction and political debate among voters. According to political analysts, the dispute between Prashant Kishore and Sanjay Jaiswal is not only a case of two people, but it can also affect the strategic impact and election results in state politics. It became clear from the interaction and rhetoric of the two leaders that strategy, coalition and methods of influencing voters would be emphasized in the upcoming meeting election. Local and national media are constantly covering the dispute. The statements of the two leaders also become viral on social media, which created an atmosphere of debate among the general public and political commentators. Experts believe that this oral war could be more intense in the coming months, especially if the round of election campaigns and public meetings will begin. From this whole incident, it is clear that the meeting election in Bihar is not only among political parties, but also plays an important role between individual leaders and their views. The war between Prashant Kishore and Sanjay Jaiswal shows how sensitive and competitive the political atmosphere can be before the election. In the coming days, it will be interesting to see to what extent this dispute affects the opinion of the public and the strategy of the leaders. Political observers believe that the leaders who present their message will be limited and effective in winning in the election field.