This legal expert is the value of jurisatives as pp inappropriate

Jakarta – President Prabowo Subiantto has the government’s regulation no. 24 of 2025 signed, whose content gave awards in the form of light to parole to witnesses who were willing to work with law enforcement to expose criminal cases or co -workers of justice (JC). Trisakti University’s legal expert, Abdul Fickar Hadjar, considered it inappropriate. Abdul Fickar said JC entered the right side of the judge, and according to him, the president had no right to interfere in the cases. He was of the opinion that it was an intervention. “JC in the context of the sentence is the domain of justice, so the president as the CEO cannot interfere in the area of ​​judicial judicial interference. This is an intervention,” Abdul Fickar told reporters on Thursday (6/26/2025). Browse to continue with the content that Abdul believes that the JC was correct in the Protection of Witnesses of the Offenders and/Victims Act. According to him, if the JC is placed in the PP by law, he says he is not appropriate. “JC should and is regulated in the Act, in this case, the Perlindubgan Act is of the offenders and/victims. Thus, even if the president interferes, in this case who participated in the Provision Protection Act/suspects Act. Furthermore, he emphasized that the surge of a sentence was certainly the authority of the judge, not the president. “To drop the sentence was not the domain of the president as the CEO, as the head of state, the president did not have the right to interfere in the giving, amnesty, abolition and rehabilitation. Furthermore, the president as head of state was not authorized,” he said. It is known, the government regulation on Justice’s collaborator was signed by Prabowo on May 8, 2025. The rules regarding the Awards for Justice Controls were written in Article 4. There were two awards by the government, namely: a. Criminal explanation relief; or. Conditional release, additional remission and other prisoners’ rights in accordance with the provisions of the Witness legislation who are prisoners. This rule was made to give legal certainty and justice to the witnesses of the offenders in the process of inquiry, prosecution and investigation during a court hearing. As well as guarantee the rights of witnesses of the offenders who were prisoners. During this time, the arrangement regarding the specific coping mechanism and the award of witnesses were not extensively regulated in different statutory provisions. Therefore, we need rules regarding specific coping mechanisms and witnesses. (AZH/AUD) HOEGENG Awards 2025 Read the inspiring story of the exemplary police candidate here