The Supreme Court reprimanded UP police, said: The rule of law has completely collapsed - the Supreme Court reprimanded police, said the legal rules have complete collections

The Supreme Court questioned the operation of the work of the Uttar Pradesh and said that the rule of law in the state had completely collapsed. The court said in a case that it could not be accepted to transform civil controversies into criminal cases. The court sought an answer from the DGP and the investigating officer and banned criminal proceedings. Jagran Bureau, New -Delhi. The Supreme Court on Monday commented on the tendency to turn the civil case into a criminal case and said on Monday that the rule of law in Uttar Pradesh had completely collapsed. The court said it could not be accepted to turn the civil case into a criminal case. The Apex Court submitted an affidavit with the Director General of the Police (DGP) of Uttar Pradesh (DGP) and the investigating officer to explain why a criminal case was started in the Civil Dispatch? These remarks on Monday made a three -member bank by Chief Justice Sanjeev Khanna, Sjeev Khanna, Sanjay Kumar and KV Vishwanathan on a petition demanding Debu Singh and Deepak Singh to cancel the criminal case. What happens in Uttar Pradesh is wrong: The Supreme Court Bank said that what is happening in Uttar Pradesh is wrong. Daily civil disputes are converted into a criminal case. It is completely wrong. The case cannot be converted into a criminal case by not giving money. It’s wrong. The court expressed dissatisfaction when the lawyer said the fir was submitted because it would take time before a civil case was decided. The bank expressed dissatisfaction and said that we would instruct the investigating officer to stand in the dock and explain how a criminal case was made? The bank said you could not submit a charge page like this. The investigating officer must learn. It will take time in the civil case just because you have registered criminal cases and began criminal proceedings. In this case, Debu Singh and Deepak Singh filed an appeal by lawyer Chand Qureshi who disputed the Supreme Court of Allahabad and demanded the cancellation of firs filed against them. According to the petition, the case of Check Bounce, according to the petition, was originally from Check Bounce. The Supreme Court remained the criminal proceedings in the Noida trial against both the accused, but made it clear that the case of the check will continue against them. A FIR has been filed with the accused in terms of Section 406 (criminal betrayal), 506 (criminal threat) and 120B (criminal conspiracy) at the Sector 39 Police Station of Noida. According to the petition, the father of both Rs 25 lent Lakh from the complainant, but his father also issued a 25 lakhs check. According to the case, police registered a criminal case against the father as well as these requesters, who were asked to cancel the father after receiving the complaint. Appeal was filed in the Supreme Court after the petition was rejected from the Supreme Court. Every big news from your city, now on your phone. Download the most reliable companion of Local News Afjagran Local App.