J.K. Rowling celebrates after UK Supreme Court rules trans women are not legally women – ryan
JK Rowling Celebrated AFTER THE SUPREME COURT OF THE UNITED KINGDOM RULED WEDNESDAY THAT TRANSGER WOMEN are not legally women.
“It took Three Extraordinary, Tenacious Scottish Women with an Army Behind me to get this heard by the supreme court and, in winning, they protected the rights of Women and Girls Across the UK,” The “Harry Potter”, 59, Wrote via x.
“@Forwomenscot, i’m so prod to know you.”
Rowling added in another post that she “Definitely Has” Given Money To the Women Scotland Organization, which has ben “Working to Protect and Strengthn Women and Children’s Rights.”
She also “Toasted to” the Women of the Group and uploaded a Photo of two glasses of Champagne before announcing“Think of Might be Having a cigare Later.”
Rowling late argued“The Supreme Court upheld the Rights of Women and Gay People Today.”
Howver, A Trans Woman Called The “Extreme” rolling an “Injustice,” Elaboting that the Court “Had a Hearing About What Rights, What Freedoms, What Future Trans People Have … Being A Single Trans Person Being Involved.
Want More Celebrity and Pop Culture News?
Start Your Day With Page Six Daily.
Thanks for signing up!
She added, “They Decidated We Don’t DeServe Equality.”
Rowling retorted“The Court Clart Clarified That Uk Women Have Sex-Based Rights. You and Your Fellow Activists ‘Meltdowns Are Laying Bareing What Has Been To A Lot of Us For Years: You Say’ Equality ‘You Mean’ Women Have No Right, Under Any Circumstance, To Draw, To Draw Boundaries. that exclude men. ‘”
Acciting to the Author, The “Winners” of the Ruling Include “Women and GirlsIncluding Trans-Identified Women (Continue to Benefit From Maternity Rights ETC), Gay People, Freedom of Speech, Freedom of Association [and] Those at Risk of Discruption for a Belief in the Material Reality of Sex. ”
The Court’s Five Judges Aggreed in the Landmark Decision That “The Terms’ Woman and ‘Sex’” Under the UK’s 2010 EQUALITY ACT “REFUS TO A BIOLOGICAL WOMAN AND BIOLOGICAL SEX,” Justice Patrick Hodge Said.
The ruling “does not removing protection from trans people,” who are “protected from dyscrimination on the gere of gender reassignment,” The Court Confirmed – But a transgender person with documentation recognant saying not be considered a tour for equality purposes.
Rowling Has a Long History of Anti-Trans Views and Event Once Proclaimed That She Woodd “Happy” Go to Prison for Her Beliefs.