Should we impose boundaries for artificial intelligence machines?

Artificial intelligence wipes different aspects of the economy. It appears in the stock market with the rocket rise of the ‘Invidia’ share, and we cannot avoid the marketing riot linked to it, either among software developers who promote the promise to utilize the data, or golfers built with designs supported by this technology. Currently, artificial intelligence has become a real instrument, and businesses have begun to discover how to use it. Obstetly artificial intelligence, virtual help and self -managed cars are some of the first use of this technology. Where the workers stop performing the hard tasks to enter data, such as withdrawing specific information from the email to fill in a request or send a receipt. Programs can extract financial statements from the general disclosure files that are quickly deposited as a person and give an immediate summary of it. Most of the events of this revolution turn in offices on companies for companies. In terms of artificial intelligence, the material world – and creates the possibility of conflict and conflict – is in the field of manufacturing and logistics services. The robots are already wandering through the floors of factories and shops, making their artificial intelligence more intelligent, speed and flexible. As usual with new technology, the military is insisting innovation. This intermarriage between artificial intelligence and robots will have to set up special rules to maintain human control over it, especially as these mobile machines start outside the factory boundaries and are more common in the service economy. The development of general purposes specializes in applications in artificial intelligence that are now available on mobile robots in performing simple tasks, but it will become more complicated over time. The company “Tenyne”, which owns “Universal Robots” and “Mobile Robots”, mobile robots, a mobile driver with five cameras that allows it to make ‘vision’ and a slide ‘Inventa’ helps them to think in ‘the best way to pick up the drum or the load, even if damaged or in an inappropriate position. In the early stages of the production of robots for general purposes, this industry is still able to accept oral orders and address it to turn it into the necessary codes to implement a specific task. Although industrial robots programmed to effect regular stereotypes will always maintain their location and importance, the multitude of general purposes will distribute them if manufacturers lower their prices, so they can compete with workers working in the hour. Formic technology hires the industrial robots of businesses, and offers a robot that plays the boxes on a drummer for about $ 15 per hour with maintenance. Artificial intelligence can already write codes from the process of performing this process, showing each step to perform the task with boxes and arrows. It will not take long for the need to be limited to setting clear oral orders for the robot. Human robots will take advanced robots for human people as they fit well with a human designed world. Many businesses, including ‘Boston Dynamics’ and ‘Agility Robotics’, have designed human robots, and some of them are tested in warehouses. It is clear that the plan is to manufacture these machines that go in large quantities on two feet, and for this reason, Hyundai car bought Boston Dynamix in an agreement completed in 2021. For those who are concerned about obtaining human smart robots on all posts, there is no reason to panic. The unparalleled ingenuity in human hands makes people at least an advantage during this century. These human robots in their beginnings suffer from safety and limited battery life and are somewhat slow and ineffective. However, it should not stop the discussion on dealing with an artificial smart machine that can move. The army showed great interest in all kinds of wild, marine and air robots. Is it possible to prevent wild robots from killing people? It may be acceptable for one of them to specialize in transporting and transporting supplies or evacuating the wounded soldiers. Should she also be allowed to kill? Maybe it’s too late to conduct this discussion. The fully independent drones are already killing people in Ukraine. Peter Singer, a prominent colleague of the non -profit “New America” ​​foundation in an article published on April 14, says the efforts by a small group of activists and diplomats did not try to block deadly robots because these machines are very useful. The dominance of the robotics industry must make these human robots (and dogs) at home and rely on a supply chain of Americans. After the invention of the industrial robot, the United States failed to produce it widely, and Japan now dominates this industry with about 46% of the production of industrial robots. As far as Germany is concerned, it has 6%. The International Robot Federation does not contain details of the level of China’s production of industrial robots, but it is large and is growing fast (maybe over 100,000 robots per year). If China produces an army of robots, it is better for the United States to keep up with it. On the civilian side, it makes sense to determine that there is a person who is always responsible for the actions of robots or various robots. If a defect in the codes or other problems occurs, the person responsible must be able to identify the problem immediately and take corrective steps, including the disruption of the machine. This is clear and directly in the factory or warehouse. However, it gets more complicated when service robots are more sophisticated and interact with the public. Who is responsible? Should there be a key to disrupting the robot in the event of an emergency? Can anyone push on this key? Dangerous and deadly machines These questions must now be addressed because the robots are dangerous if not handled properly. Robot was killed in 2022 by one of “Bell” employees while rubbing the rollers on a conveyor belt that was part of an automatic drum lever. The movement of the box containing “WD-40” for lubrication and cleaning over the crane led to the operation of the camera’s camera and the activation of the robotic arm, which led to the crush of the 54-year-old worker, according to a report issued by the Department of Occupational Safety and Health. Although it can take decades until the robots become sophisticated enough to communicate with people regularly, it is now time to lay the basis for the SO calls artificial intelligence that includes working safely with people. This is a very accurate process because the rules should not suffocate innovation. There is no doubt that mating between robots and artificial intelligence will benefit humanity. Androids are tools that will take more dirty, dirty and dangerous functions that people now perform, which will free people from regular and physically exhausting functions. But the machines can deviate from control, and the risks increase as they are more plunged into daily life. A set of rules must be applied to ensure that the last word is always for people.