Web or Conversion: Repenters cannot escape by claiming to be victims, an important remark from the Gujarat High Court - Repenters cannot escape by claiming to be victims, says the Gujarat High Court in Gujarat says

Updated: Fri, 10 Oct 2025 06:00 am (IST) Gujarat High Court said that people who claim to be victims of religious repentance may face legal action if they convert others later. The Court made this remark during the trial of the petition filed by those accused of religious repentance. The requesters described themselves as victims of religious conversion. The court rejected his petition and said that Prima facie made a crime against him. Important remark from the Gujarat High Court. (Lying photo) Digital desk, New -Delhi. The Gujarat High Court said that if people who claim to be victims of religious repentance later try to convert others, then legal action can be taken against them. The Court of Justice Nirjar Desai, who was heard by several persons on October 1, said that their act of “influence, pressure and lure to repent to Islam is” a prima facie offense against them. The requesters claim that they were originally Hindus and were converted by other persons. Therefore, he himself was the victim of religious repentance, not the accused. Remove ads that have only read news. The accused approached the Supreme Court. The court said they were involved in the “under pressure and attracted other persons to convert to Islam”, which is prima facie a violation against them. Many people accused of religious repentance approached the Supreme Court and argued that they themselves were the victim of religious conversion and that the FIR lay against them was false. He demands cancellation from the fir who was filed against him with the Amod police station in the Bharuch district. What did the Supreme Court say while rejecting the petition? The Supreme Court rejected their plea, saying: “As can be seen with the fir and the statements of the witnesses, because of their act of influencing, pushing and attracting other persons to embrace Islam, the court believes that the repentance of the victims prima facie indicates a crime.” Therefore, it cannot be assumed that the accused persons who are Hindus and were later converted to Islam can be called victims based on the allegations made in the fir, and the material collected in the form of the charge sheet during the investigation. ” The Court has sections 120 (b) (criminal conspiracy), 153 (b) (1) (c) (c) (promotion of enmity between different groups) and 295 (b) These were hearing headlines filed by several persons charged under the Indian Criminal Act (deliberate and malicious acts intended to indignantly). What did the complainant claim? A complaint claimed that three people repented by taking his thumb impression and that one of the accused gets financial assistance for this work. According to the Fir, the three accused converted about 100 people from 37 Hindu families to Islam by giving them money and other incentives. When the complainant protested, he was threatened, after which he contacted the police. A case is registered against nine people, who took a total of 16 people as accused. Some of them have moved the Supreme Court to cancel the fir. In another petition, the filor (who is a foreign national) was accused of providing funds for religious conversion activities. The Supreme Court said Prima facie also made a case against him. The court said: “No relief can be granted to the filer, especially if he was a foreign national, he visited India about 25 times before the crime was registered, and even after the fir was registered, he did not work on the investigation.” We see no reason to entertain this petition. “