Former PDIP cadres did not accept the Hasto camp, call himself the name of the name

Jakarta – Former PDI Perjuangan Cadre Saful Bahri does not claim to accept that it often named the secretary general of PDIP Hasto Kristiyanto. Saful emphasized that he never took anyone’s name. It was transferred by Saful in the alleged bribery for the management of interim replacement members (PAW) members of the House of Representatives for Maskiku Masara and the investigation with defendant Hasto Kristiyanto, at Central Jakarta Corruption Court, Thursday (5/22/2025). Initially, prosecutor Saful asked whether or not other facts should be conveyed in the hearing. “There are things that Witnesses want to convey before this hearing?”, The prosecutor said. Browse to continue with related content “?” Answer Saful. “Yes, perhaps the term word earlier, that there are facts that have not been revealed?” Ask the prosecutor. “Yes, I saw my bap on yesterday’s investigation, the facts presented were more than before. It’s all,” Saful replies. Saful then claimed to object when Hasto Kristiyanto’s stronghold claimed to have to turn a person’s name. Saful emphasized that what he said was true and that there was no profitability. “And at this time there are no parties that are witnesses in this bribery, especially if my mix is ​​mostly here, is there something that wants to be transferred?” Ask the prosecutor. “Yes, what, if you are the paint, I would rather object to the Catut,” Saful replies. The prosecutor then asked about the figure who accused Saful. Saful explained that the profitability arose when former Bawaslu member Agustiani Tio Fridelina, with lawyer Donny Tri Istiqomah, became a witness in the Hasto case. “Who saved the painter?” Ask the prosecutor. “At that time there were Tio and Donny here, I read it in the media, so I explained that all I reported, and then there was no profitability, still published in the media,” Saful replied. “So the witness who was transferred was a fact that the witness was natural?” Ask the prosecutor. “What I experienced,” Saful replies. Previously, the advocate of PDIP Secretary General Hasto Kristiyanto, Ronny Talappesy, replied related to the ‘mother’s orders’ in a recording of a conversation between former Indonesian Bawaslu member Agustiani Tio Fridelina, with former PDIP cadre Saful Bahri. Ronny said Saful often got the name. “That’s what we call the name. Following the name. Decorate the name often. It was a statement of independence. It was proven. Earlier, Sister Tio conveyed that Brother Saful was his habit of bearing people’s names. Ronny requested that the ‘mother’s order’ should not frame as a party leader’s order. Because he said that the replacement process between the time (PAW) was only party orders. “In my opinion, we should not framework that it is as if it is related to party leaders. It is an order of the party. Organization, yes, because it is executing decisions of the Supreme Court. It’s clear,” he said. Watch the video: The former PDIP cadre -answered when asked about the ‘mother’ order at the Hasto (AMW/WHN) Trial at all, Read the inspirational story of the exemplary police candidate here