WAQF LAW: Center gave these arguments about the strict questions of CJI, testing of WAQF Act in SC; Trial will still be held today - the Supreme Court hearing on WAQF Act important things here know full details

The Supreme Court over the WAQF Act expressed concern about the violence during protests against the Waqf Amendment Act 2025. The court said it was a disturbing incident. Many important things came to light during the hearing. The court considered the idea of ​​issuing an interim order not to make the WAQF properties with WAQF by users. Jagran Bureau, New -Delhi. The Supreme Court expressed concern about the violence during the protest against the Waqf Amendment Act 2025, which calls it a disturbing incident. When the hearing on the WAQF Act was completed on Wednesday, Chief Justice Sanjeev Khanna said that one thing was very disturbing. The violence that happens is bothering it. The attorney General Tushar Mehta, who agrees with CJI’s concern, said the protesters think he would push the system in this way. But then Kapil Sibal, on behalf of the Muslim requesters, appeared against Mehta’s arguments and said-which were put pressure on pressure. We don’t know. However, other advocates present in court also expressed concern about the violence, saying that there should be no violence. The CJI also said that some things are good in law too. He must also be highlighted, as said by my fellow judge. CJI pointed to Justice KV Vishwanath, who called some good provisions of WAQF Law during the hearing. It is known that there was violence in protest against Waqf Amendment Act in Murshidabad, Bengal and some people were also killed. After this, a large number of Hindus migrated from Murshidabad. In addition, there were reports of violence from the Bhangarh region in Bengal. Important trial things can stop some of the provisions of the Supreme Court WAQF Act. The court said he is considering issuing an interim order not to make the WAQF characteristics of WAQF by user. In addition, the court intended not to include -Muslims in the central WAQF Parishad and WAQF directions and pass the interim order on the powers of the collector on WAQF properties. But at the request of the opposition of the central government and his arguments on these issues first heard, the court postponed the hearing of the case until Thursday. Now the court will hear the arguments of the central government and the requesters supporting the law on Thursday. Only then will it be decided whether or not an interim order will come in this case. The court raised several questions on both sides during the hearing on the WAQF Act today during the hearing Thursday. When he was questioned about the opposition of the registration of the submission of the WAQF properties registration, he questioned the central government to make registration of WAQF properties with WAQF per user. While questioning the Attorney General Tushar Mehta, who advocates the center over the proceeds to include -muslims in the Central Waqf Council and WAQF directions, the Hourt reminded the Hindu Succession Act to the opposition of the new law on Waqf Al -Auladers by Muslim Petitioners. More than 70 petitions filed with the court said this article does not prevent parliament from entering laws. It is equally applied to everyone. During the trial that lasted two hours, there was a strong debate from both sides and the court also moved questions. More than 70 petitions have been filed in the Supreme Court regarding the WAQF Act. Most of these were demanded to cancel the WAQF Amendment Act, 2025, as unconstitutional. However, some petitions have also filed in support of the law. Some petitions claimed a bank of Waqf Act, 1995 and WAQF Amendment Act, 2025, on Thursday. On Thursday, a Bank of Chief Justice Sanjeev Khanna, Sanjay Kumar and KV Vishwanathan will hear the case. Initially, the court was not very willing to consider the case. The Chief Justice asked two questions to the requesters in the beginning. The first is, why should all the petitions not be sent to the Supreme Court and the Supreme Court must hear the case? The second question was that the requester should briefly explain on what grounds he disputed the law? Senior advocates Kapil Sibal, Rajiv Dhawan, Abhishek Manu Singhvi and Cu Singh appear on behalf of the requesters who oppose the WAQF Act, while the attorney General appeared on behalf of the central government. What did Kapil Sibal say? The court has not yet issued a formal notice in this case. But the central government has filed a cavity so that the court does not take any interim order during the unilateral hearing. Hear his side before giving any command. Kapil Sibal said that this law interferes with the right to freedom to manage the religious qualities of Muslims. This law is unconstitutional. Every latest news and accurate information from the country and the world, every moment on your phone! Download now- Jagran app