Who makes the claim to cancel the WAQF Act? There will be a major hearing in SC today, which understands the entire development in 10 points - who recalls the Waqf Act Big Hearing SC Undrand Entre incident in 10 points

A petition was filed by many opposition parties and leaders in the Supreme Court regarding the WAQF Act. 10 petitions were listed before the bank led by CJI Shev Khanna, but 70 petitions were filed against the WAQF Act. In some petitions, it is demanded to cancel it as unconstitutional. The petition filed against the WAQF Act will be heard in SC (File Photo) Digital Desk, New -Delhi. The petitions filed in the Supreme Court will be heard today regarding the WAQF Act. The Bank of CJI Sanjeev Khanna and Justice PV Sanjay Kumar will listen to arguments against the WAQF board from 14:00 and to the petitions submitted in support. 10 petitions are listed near the bank led by CJI. But more than 70 petitions have been filed against religious institutions, MPs, political parties, states, including the WAQF Act. Let me know what has happened so far on the WAQF Act … The WAKF Bill on the WAQF Board adopted from Parliament on April 4 was approved by the president on April 5. The government issued a notice from April 8 for the implementation of the Act. 7 States, including Haryana, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh, Uttarakhand and Assam, have submitted a petition in the Supreme Court that the Constitutional Validity of the WAC Amendment Act of the WAQF Council 2025 should be ratified. The ten petitions led by Chief Justice of India Sanjeev Khanna will hear that MP Parliament Aaam Aadmi Party Mla Amanatullah Khan, Association for Prettion of Civil Rights, Jamiat Ulema-Hind President Arshad Madani, All Kerala Jami Kadri, Taiyab Khani, Mohammed Shadri, Moham, Mohad Mohammed, Mohammed, Mohammed Fazlurrahim and RJD -LP Manoj Kumar Jha submitted. In some petitions, this Act is demanded to cancel it as unconstitutional. Some petitions have claimed a ban on its implementation. It was also described as an arbitrary and discriminatory against Muslims. In his petition, Aimim chief Asaduddin Owaisi said that the revised law abolished the security given to WAQF. He claimed that it was discriminatory to reduce the security given to WAQF properties and maintain it for other religions. Amanatullah Khan, AAP, argued in his petition that the inclusion of non-Muslim members in the Waqf Council is a violation of Article 14 and has no rational relationship with the purpose of the administration of religious property. The government said this bill is about property and its management, not about religion. The government said there are large scale irregularities in the management of WAQF properties and that their income does not help poor Muslims or women and children, which will correct the revised law. This bill was also drawn up after consulting a large part of the people and has the support of non-Muslim minorities. The government claimed that the bill was investigating the investigation of the joint parliamentary committee and that several amendments proposed by the members were included. Protests were held in many parts of the country against the WAQF Act and the bill for it. The worst of these occurred in Bengal, where three people died and became very homeless in violence during protests. Bengal’s chief minister Mamata Banerjee said her government would not implement the Revised Waqf Act. Every latest news and accurate information from the country and the world, every moment on your phone! Download now- Jagran app