Telangana government's command, give admission to married women inferences for girls

The Telangana government recently made a decision that revived the debate in the field of education and women’s rights. The state government has announced that only unmarried women will be admitted to the Colleges of Social Welfare degree. The government, through the government, said the reason for this decision that the arrival of married women is leading the attention of other students. This step has become a controversial topic from the perspective of the right to education, social equality and empowerment of women. Details on the government’s argument and notices, the notice issued by the Telangana Social Welfare Residential Education Institutes Society, states that only unmarried women can apply in the first year of BA, BCom, BSc in the upcoming academic year 2017-18. This order is currently being implemented for a year. Currently, there are about 4,000 women studying in these residential colleges, who will take admission in the second year next year. Venkat Raju, content manager of society, told the media that their purpose is to focus the focus of the students. He said that the men of married girl students came to meet them once or twice a week, leading the students’ attention to studies of studies. The reason behind this argument is of the opinion that for this reason it is difficult to consider. On the other hand, Dr. RS Praveen Kumar, secretary of society, acknowledges that the marriage of children is a serious problem in the state, which is why the construction of residential colleges for women has been done with the aim of preventing child marriage. But he also said that it is not possible to stop married women from entering this order. This decision of the protest and criticism was opposed by many social workers and women’s rights organizations. He believes that this decision is not only a violation of women’s rights, but it is also an insult to sacred social ties such as marriage. The women’s rights activist V. Sandhya said that this step of the government reflects ‘tragic’ and ‘backward’ thinking. He said such decisions raised serious questions about the rights of women’s education. Sandhya also said that marriages with children occur on a large scale in Telangana, where many girls get married in childhood. In such a situation, if she wants to be trained, it cannot be the government’s responsibility to exclude them from education. Social workers and students organizations also describe this decision as discriminatory. He says that marriage cannot stop the path of education of any woman. He demanded from the government that this decision be withdrawn immediately and that education should be available to everyone equally. Child marriage and education are a serious social problem throughout the country, including Telangana. Girls often remain incomplete because of the marriage of children. The government’s effort is to give education facilities to girls to prevent such practices. In such a situation, the question arises whether it is the right solution to keep married women away from education? Experts believe that education is the greatest medium to change society. By offering teaching opportunities to married women, they not only make themselves strong, but can also bring about positive changes in their family and society. Only with education can reduce evil practices such as child marriage. All citizens have the right to free and compulsory primary education under section 21A of the Constitution. At the same time, the Constitution ensures equal right to women for women. It is against the principles of the Constitution to deprive any woman on the basis of marriage or marital status. Education experts and social justice supporters say that the state government should make more inclusive and assistant policy instead of making such decisions, so that married women can continue their studies as well. Special facilities, awareness campaigns and social support are needed for this. The conclusion of the Telangana government is only one year, but its impact and message are quite a social level. This decision reflects the lack of sensitivity to women’s rights on education and is considered discriminatory. It is the responsibility of both society and the government to provide female opportunities in every situation. Covering any woman of education based on her marital status is not only a violation of her personal rights, but it is also an obstacle in the path of social progress. It is imperative that the government reconsider this decision and take concrete steps to make education accessible and equal to all women, so that equality, development and empowerment of women in society is strengthened. You