The charge of contempt on the judicial officer laid down the charge of contempt, and HC expressed this decision – contempt charge drafted against the person who made derogatory remarks against judicial officer

Updated: Di, 07 Oct 2025 07:19 am (IST) The administrative judge of the Supreme Court found the truth in the allegations after examining the message, saying that the law is similar to contempt to blaspheme and terrorize the legal system. After this, the case was placed in front of the bank, which calls criminal contempt. Legal Correspondent, Jagran, Prayagraj. The Allahabad High Court has drawn up for contempt against Krishna Kumar Pandey, who is accused of making derogatory remarks about the WhatsApp group over a judicial officer of the Basti District Court. The remarks on a group of advocates for the district court also broadcast a lot. Remove ad, just read the news, a Justice JJ Munir department bank and Justice Pramod Kumar Srivastava, who hears the case, said Krishna Kumar should be sued for injuring the court’s reputation and reducing his rights in terms of section 2 (c) of the court. According to the case, Krishna Kumar posted a message in the WhatsApp group of the Basti district’s advocates that there are serious allegations of corruption against an ADJ, accusing him of taking bribes and writing false and false commands in pending civil and criminal cases. It was said that these allegations were deliberately made to blaspheme the court and weaken its rights. The administrative judge of the Supreme Court found the truth in the allegations after examining the message, saying that this law is similar to contempt to threaten the justice system, discredit and terrorize the court. Also read- The Allahabad High Court rejected the claim of compensation for land obtained on the basis of the agreement, and the land acquisition in Land Procurement in MeerUT was followed by a case before the bank made a list of criminal contempt. The accused gave notice and several opportunities were given to salvation, but he rejected the proposal and said he could defend himself. During the proceedings of the case, the court found that Krishna Kumar is not a lawyer, but he is a member of the WhatsApp group of the lawyers of the settlement. When notifications were issued to the district’s officials officials, the court was the assurance that affirmative steps would be taken to prevent such abuse of professional groups. The court asked Krishna Kumar Pandey to submit his side of contempt and submit his side.