The government's claim at 67 thousand square meters in Prayagraj Hitech City rejected the state government in the Supreme Court - the government's claim at 67 thousand square meters of land in Prayagraj Hi Tech City rejects the state government.

The state government had a setback in the Allahabad High Court in a dispute over the land registered in the name Hi -tech City Prayagraj. Justice Shekhar B. A Saraf and Justice Vipin Chandra Dixit divisional bank ordered the government to restore the revenue documents in favor of the petition within eight weeks, which rejected the government’s claim at 67138.12 square meters of land in Karchana Tehsil. The Supreme Court rejected the government’s claim on the country, the legislature, Jagran, Prayagraj. The state government had a setback in the Allahabad High Court in a dispute over the land registered in the name Hi -tech City Prayagraj. Justice Shekhar B. A Saraf and Justice Vipin Chandra Dixit divisional bank ordered the government to restore the revenue documents in favor of the requesters within eight weeks, which rejected the government’s claim at 67.138.12 square meters of land in Karchana Tehsil. The court said the petition was filed in the year 2016 20 years after the state was allegedly captured. It is clear that the country has been occupied by the filor until then. If disputed facts can be detected, the written court may consider the question of the actual occupation of surplus soil. In this petition submitted in terms of section 226, the requesters prayed to issue a mandate from the country or to prevent peaceful occupation. In the appropriate episode, the state could not determine that the actual occupation of the country was taken before the establishment of the urban country (sealing and regulation) The Relations Act, 1999. Yachi Ram Ji and others’ father -in -in -law and grandfather Bholanath had agricultural land in the Lavayan Kala -dorp. Action was introduced against Bolanath against Bholanath in terms of section 6 (1) of the Urban Country Act (Ceiling and Regulation), 1976, and a one -sided order was accepted against him in 1983. Below is 67,138,12 square meters of land declared surplus. Starting proceedings under section 10 of the Ceiling Act and Bholanath were given 30 days to surrender the surplusland. Nevertheless, neither Bholanath surrendered the country and could not take possession of the officer either. In 2005, Bholanath was occupied to death. Then the successor was caught. In 2015, based on the Relationship Act on Urban Land (sealing and regulation), 1999, the authorities ordered the requesters to vacate the surplusland within thirty days, saying that they would be evicted by force if it did not happen. In the Supreme Court, the requesters sought security against eviction. The bank acknowledged that the state failed to prove that the surplusland was occupied. The court said a government order indicated that the state government had transferred land to the PrayAgraj Development Authority in 1996, but that no notice of violence or compensation had been brought to record. The requesters showed measles of 1422 crops (year 2012), in which Ramji and his legal heirs had land. In the anti-affidavit, the defendants presented the Khatauni of the year 1426–1431 (year 2016-2021) named State. Khatauni of Cropped Year 1414-1419 (in accordance with the year 2004-2009) was also recorded, in which the country was recorded in the name of the High Tech Township. Every big news from your city, now on your phone. Download the most reliable companion of Local News Afjagran Local App.