Judge to Witnesses of the Undip PPDS case: Senior task is bullied by Junior, what do you want to be?

Semarang – The alleged case of harassment and extortion in the Specialist Medical Training Program (PPDS) Anathesia of the Faculty of Medicine, the University of Diponegoro (UNDIP) presented a number of PPDs Undip 77 witnesses. The judge had witnesses for assessing there was no harassment in the case of the late doctor Aulia Risma. The witnesses offered are each the name Bayu, Kalika, Danang, Nur Akbar and Rezki. Member Judge, Legal People Situmumorang, highlighted the recognition of witnesses that senior tasks were performed by the juniors. ‘Your senior task is being told to do it so well? Isn’t it negotiations? ‘ Judge men asked Witnesses at the Semarang District Court on Wednesday (6/25/2025), reported by Detikjateng. Browse to continue with the contents of one of the witnesses, Bayu, and reply ‘depending’. The answer made the judge react in a high tone. ‘Just imagine until the 77th generation activities like this are done. Why, because you don’t want to report because you don’t want to complain. If the 60th generation has complained, you don’t have to die or not? ‘ strict. The judge’s statement led to the alleged harassment and monthly fee of students up to ten millions per person, which was partly used to finance senior needs. The judge judged that he had just met the tradition at PPDs Undip. “Senior tasks are also done with juniors. Funny, and it happened at the PPDS -Narcosus Faculty of Medicine Undip, what do you want to be? Is that the question,” he continued. In the first session of the UNDIP -PPDs case, it was previously reported, Monday (5/26) the Narcotic Head of Anesthesia, Taufik Eko Nugroho and Sri Maryani, who collected RP 80 million per student, were charged with violating section 368 paragraph (1) of the criminal code. While defendant Zara, a senior as well as a ‘Bok’, also known as the Aulia class supervisor, was charged with coercion and extortion of his juniors at the UNDIP PPDS Marthosis. For his actions, Zara was charged with violating section 368 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Act regarding extortion and section 335 paragraph (1) of the penal code regarding coercion for violence. Read more here. (YGS/AUD) HOEGENG Awards 2025 Read the inspiring story of the exemplary police candidate here