"Without proper trial, accused cannot be allowed to rot in jail," the Supreme Court ordered the case to settle the case soon - the accused could not be allowed to rot in jail without a proper hearing

“Without the proper hearing, the accused cannot be allowed to rot in jail,” the Supreme Court soon ordered the case. The Supreme Court said in a UAPA case that an accused could not be allowed to rot in prison without proper and quick trial. A Bank of Justice Vikram Nath and KV Vishwanathan ordered a trial court to quickly expand the hearing and complete within two years as it should. ‘The accused could not be allowed to rot in jail without proper trial- the Supreme Court Pti, New Delhi. The Supreme Court said in a UAPA case that no accused could be allowed to rot in prison without proper and quick trial. More than 100 witnesses will be investigated. A Bank of Justices Vikram Nath and KV Vishwanathan ordered a trial court to quickly expand the hearing and finalize within two years, as more than 100 witnesses must be investigated by the prosecution. The Apex Court expressed its ruling on two appeals against the order of the Karnataka High Court in April 2022, which granted bail to an accused, but refused to give relief to the other co-accused. While the appeal of the center disputed the acceptance of bail. A fir was registered against 17 accused, the second appeal was filed by co -accused who were denied relief. In January 2020, a fir was filed against 17 accused in Bengaluru, including allegations under the Illegal Activities Act (Prevention), 1967 (UAPA). The case was later allocated to the NIA and a charge sheet was filed in July 2020. However, the bank said the fact still remains that the hearing has not begun, while five years and six months are over. The accused may not be allowed to rot in jail without hearing the right and fast audience.