Jagran correspondent, New -Delhi. The Delhi High Court rejected an appeal request in which he was revoked from a prosecution of a prosecution in an arsonist case related to the riots of north-east of Delhi in 2020. The trial court also rejected the police request earlier. The Bank of Justice Neena Bansal Krishna, in its verdict delivered on the case on Monday, said the police petition has no basis. Former Councilor Tahir Hussain, suspended of the AAM AADMI party, is accused in this case. Police disputed the trial court’s decision and argued that the charges were drawn up against the six accused on February 7, 2023, and that the case was listed for the testimony of the prosecution. On January 28 this year, the prosecution (SI), who stated that he said at 24-02-2020, about 11:30 to 30 hours, questioned in connection with the call made by the accused, and he found that the store in question was in a burnt condition and that the shutter was also broken and a shop was in Chand Bagh. While the prosecution interviewed another witness (chief constable) on February 4, 2025, who testified at 24-2-2020, between 23:30 and 12 hours, he was at the sub-inspector (SI) and he found the store in normal condition. After this, the prosecution filed a petition to revoke the SI in light of the testimony of the main constable, but it was rejected on February 7. Advocate for the accused argued that the trial court’s order was logical and required no interference.
The petition to call on the witness in Delhi rejected, what did the Supreme Court say? – Delhi riot case witness reminiscent of the plea rejected by the Supreme Court
