The Supreme Court hearing in the case of Udaipur Files Liles, which was postponed by August 8, sought from CBFC, was investigated 160 witnesses

Last updated: July 30, 2025, 18:02 IST hearing was held in the Delhi High Court on ‘Udaipur files’. The Supreme Court will hear the case on August 8. The Supreme Court also sought answers from CBFC. The film is expected to be released only after the trial is completed. This Phil … Read more about the case ‘Udaipur Files’ in the Delhi High Court on August 8. The hearing on ‘Udaipur files’ in the highlights in Delhi will be held on August 8. The answer was sought at CBFC, 160 Witnesses were investigated. The film is based on the murder case of Kanhaiya Lal. New -delhi. The trial was held in the Delhi High Court on Wednesday about the film ‘Udaipur Files’. The trial was held by the bank led by Chief Justice Devendra Kumar Upadhyay. On behalf of Javed, accused in this case, senior lawyer Manska Guruswami presented the team, while the lawyer Gaurav Bhatia made arguments on behalf of the filmmaker. The case will be heard on August 8. ‘Udaipur Files’ is based on the murder case of Kanhaiya Lal in 2022 in Udaipur. Mohammad Riyaz Attari and Mohammad Gaus were accused in this murder case, who allegedly carried out the murder in response to a social media position. The film was filed against the film by Maulana Arshad Madani, president of Jamiat Ulema-E-Hind and Mohammad Javed, an accused in the murder. He claims that the film is angry with the Muslim community and can affect the ongoing trial. During the hearing, Maneka Guruswami, lawyer of the murder of Kanhaiya Lal, Mohammad Javed, argued that 160 witnesses were still investigated in the case and that age was only 19 years at the time of his client’s arrest. According to Bassed Lawyer Varun Sinha on the Scriptural Roads page of ‘Udaipur Files’, Guruswami said the filmmaker clearly said that the script of ‘Udaipur files’ is based on the charge magazine and that the dialogues were taken directly from the charge page. In addition, he claimed that the central government abused its review forces by violating the statutory process of the Film Act. Now the next hearing will be held in this case on August 8, in which the lawyers of the Sensora Board (CBFC) will answer the questions asked by the court. In three types of provision, Guruswami legally stated that the current law provides for three types of review forces. The central government can use it. A power is in section 2a. The government can say that the film cannot be broadcast. Secondly, they can change certification and thirdly they can cancel it. But in the provision, the central government does not have the right to change the film cutting, removing dialogue, adding disconnection, changing the disruption of the censorship board. About author Ramesh Kumar Ramesh Kumar, from September 2021, is associated with News18 Hindi Digital. Previously, ABP News, Hindirsh (Pinkvilla), Haribhoomi, Univarta (UNI) and the national world worked. Interest in entertainment, education and politics … Read more Ramesh Kumar, from September 2021 News18 is associated with Hindi Digital. Previously, ABP News, Hindirsh (Pinkvilla), Haribhoomi, Univarta (UNI) and the national world worked. Interest in entertainment, education and politics … Read more location: Mumbai, Maharashtra HomeenTainment ‘Udaipur Files’ will be decided on August 8 in the Supreme Court, sought from CBFC