The Madhya Pradesh High Court made in an important order clear that if a person is married again, the appeal that the marriage group recommends will no longer be considered perfect. The court expressed the ruling that if the appeal had filed within the set time limit, it would have been tried, but it was not legal to challenge it to remarriage. A bank of the judge of the High Court Vishal Dhagat and Justice Anuradha Shukla accepted their order in the case and rejected the appeal. The court said in its order that the hearing could pose such an appeal to a threat to the third party’s marriage and civil rights. The court also made it clear that, by law, it is compulsory to follow the time limit to appeal against the division of marriage. In the order, the court said it is necessary to provide legal security and stability to the new marriage relations of a remarriage. If the appeal is allowed against the Old Marriage Division Order, the third party, ie the marriage rights of the new man or woman, may be influenced. Legal experts believe that this decision can become an important example in family law and marriage disputes. The court made clear that only the appeal submitted within the set time limit would be considered trial. The appeal submitted after this, no matter how strong the basis is, will be considered legally ineffective. Experts also said that this order of the court is important to maintain marriage stability and family balance. This ensures that the new marriage relationship and rights of the person reliving the remarriage are protected from the legal point of view. The court also made it clear in its order that the delay in the process of the appellant endangered the rights of third party. After this decision, the law experts believe that this order will be guide in family disputes in the future. The court made clear that both the compliance with the deadline and the protection of marriage justice are extremely important in cases related to the division of marriage. At the same time, this decision will also have an impact in cases where a second marriage was made after the old marriage. The court rejected the attempt to challenge the old order in such cases, saying it was only a step to protect the legal process. This order of the Madhya Pradesh High Court is therefore a clear example for the time limit, legal stability and custody of third -party rights in marriage. After this ruling, the rigor and legal discipline of the court in family affairs became clearer. Share this story -tags
-
-
-
-
