Surprisingly enough, Ferry Irwandi when the TNI said he had found other alleged crimes

Jakarta – The TNI claims to have found other alleged more serious crimes against the founder of the Malacca project, Ferry Irwandi, after he was unable to report due to the decision of the Constitutional Court (MK). Ferry claims to be confused. Ferry acknowledged that he was confused about which criminal would weaken him. Ferry questions who he hurt. “As far as my case is concerned, why I was just as much suggested as I am, I was looking for, I did not know so far,” Ferry said in a discussion titled “Danger of Militarism: the threat of human rights defenders and militarization of cyberspace” held on Friday (12/9/2025). Browse to continue with the content “the last” can be again, has a more serious criminal act. I’m surprised. What are they? Who I hurt, “he added. Then Ferry also discussed the case of the coordinating Minister of Law, Human Rights, Immigration and Correctional Yusril Ihza Mahendra who talked about his case. For him, it’s strange because he’s just an ordinary citizen.” A pack of Yusril Ihza Mahendra said, Mr. Mahfud said, everything said, even if it said. They still think we found a more serious crime after yesterday’s fast. I am an ordinary citizen, what is sought? “He said. Ferry also questions the TNI’s efforts to find the alleged crime. He questioned what considered him threatening. ‘ I was even confused when I was asked, searched for Kuber, who was searched by the TNI puspen, said there was a serious threat, what was I threatening to? So I also wonder, also confused, “he said. The TNI found other criminal indications that the TNI said to respect the ruling of the Constitutional Court (MK) that the institution could not report slander according to the ITS legislation. However, the TNI claimed that they did not relate to other alleged crimes related to the Ferry Irwandi, However, defamation offense. Freddy said his party was discussing the alleged criminal offenses referred to internally. “Therefore, the next step is to review and discuss it internally in the TNI, the legal construction,” he said. Respected freedom of opinion. We hope that all citizens to express their opinions will also obey the appropriate legal course, “Freddy said.” Do not spread disinformation, slander and hatred. Do not interpret sheep and sheep between officials and the community, as well as between the TNI and the National Police who have the potential to divide the unity and integrity of the nation, “he continued. Legislature: Many people are urged to insist members of the House of Representatives Commission I, Junico Siahaan, said there are still many matters outside. Urgent and broad impact that also needs the attention of the authorities, ‘Junico told reporters on Friday (12/9/2025). The attention of law enforcement should not be focused on individual cases that are not considered direct threats to the public interest, ‘the PDIP legislator said. In a democratic state, state institutions, including defense institutions, must address an address of an address in the criticism and an expression of an expression of the citizens. The decision of the Constitutional Court on the ITE-Legal decision of the Constitutional Court Number 105/Puu-XXII/2024 was expressed by nine constitutional judges on April 29, 2025. The ninth is Suhartoyo as chairman and Saldi Isra, Eny Nurbaningsih, Anwar Uri, Daniel Yusmic, Enyy Nurbaningsih, Anwar Uri, Daniel Yusmic, Eny Nurbaningsih, Foekh, Arief Hidayat, M Guntur Hamzah, Ridwan Mansyur and Arsul Sani, each. Constitutional Court granted the requester’s request for part of the petition. Corporations, occupations or positions, “Yusril’s comment on the TNI’s steps to report ferry for slander, quotes an answer from the Coordinating Minister (Menko) of Law, Human Rights, Immigration and Corrections (Kumham Imipas) Yusril Ihza Maahendra. Victims who have to report are individuals, not institutions. Yusril invited if he wanted to take on other legal efforts over the alleged criminal slander. It still respects the appropriate legal process. “If there are legal action that wants to be taken, it continues, but not with the slander because Defamation is an individual,” Yusril explained. (AZH/AZH)