China did not destroy the technological sector.

China, in the eyes of most Western observers, seems to have driven the technological sector to the abyss. By the end of 2023, the number of startups decreased by 50 thousand companies from the peak it reached in 2018, with the expectation that this year will be a bigger decline. The market capital of the largest technology companies, including the group “Ali Baba Holding” and “Tennsant Holdings”, shrinks hundreds of billions of rands and is faded and slight compared to its US counterparts. There is no indication that the sector will one day return to what it was before the government restriction campaign that started at the end of 2020, not even with the signal of the policy makers until the end of it. Your transformation into a billionaire entrepreneur has become a matter of fear, rather than celebrating. It is easy for the policymakers in the United States to regard it as a confirmation of their positions and additional evidence of the superiority of the technological scene in their country. From their point of view, they had right that President Xi Jinping had suffocated a generation of entrepreneurs who could benefit consumers and earn great profits for investors. However, this does not mean that the ecosystem of innovation in China is delaying. On the contrary, Shi did just to determine its purpose more accurately to focus on national dominance and security in a way that can change the balance of world power. The moral incentive gave Beijing its technological industry that the Silicon Valley can only dream about, gave it a message or a task that you do. It can be easy for investors and capitalist free markets to mock the idea of ​​innovation paid with a specific purpose. However, US entrepreneurs and workers in the technological sector have long been obsessed with this concept. The ongoing drama currently at Openai, and my colleague Parmy Olson recently wrote. The vast majority of “Gil Z” says that the feeling that you want to achieve an important goal of an incentive to work. ‘Oben Ai’ began as a non -profit research organization with the aim of benefiting artificial intelligence ‘all mankind’, and ended his case to begin the ‘chatgpt’ application, which led to the prosperity of artificial intelligence worldwide. Since it has developed into a ‘profitable’ company in a limited way, it is now about to become a profitable company, which has seen a collective exit for many of its founding members. On the other hand, many Chinese now believe that the world has become less safe than five years ago, and they see tension with Washington, one of the most urgent problems. This existential threat to the loss to the United States is currently employed as a driving force for China’s technological pursuit. The technological future, after dissolving the rapid wealth era, has doubled from its efforts to achieve “high quality growth”, led by the technological sector, as well as to bring about “common wealth”. The government has made a vision for a technological future in which China is progressing in strategic areas such as artificial intelligence, advanced manufacturing and green industries such as solar energy and electric cars. It is now that it is already fruit, as the export of batteries, electric cars and solar panels have reached record levels. The United States can currently excel in advanced technologies such as artificial intelligence, but China is progressing quickly with a sharp focus on bridging this void. New research indicates that the design of the Communist Party from the top to bottom of the dominance of this world markets pushes the innovation process faster than believed, and it is likely that many Chinese technology companies are likely to be attached to Western businesses within a decade or will exceed within a decade. Washington is clearly aware that Beijing’s technological power is a threat, and this has responded to a series of restrictions on exports to prevent China from reaching advanced artificial intelligence chips and manufacturing equipment. Self -provision, but this policy has strengthened Beijing’s commitment to the goals of technological self -humility. The recent dismantling of the ‘Huawei Xinchuang’ laptop is that the country is progressing quickly at this level, as the main chips in the device of Chinese enterprises come. Recently, Beijing supported these efforts by demanding companies for technology and electric automotive industry to buy more household chips. It has provided a semiconductor market, and it has also allowed revenue sources that can be used for research and development as well as expanding. The Innovation Ecosystem in the United States, which depends on entrepreneurship, has launched contracts for rapid economic growth and the benefits of consumers. But after startups are directed to the largest businesses in the world, the incentive to experience and find out something new. The option is no longer to innovate or die, but to maximize the value in favor of the shareholders or ends. These brightest thoughts in the Silicon Valley encouraged the focus on short -term returns instead of achieving new breakthroughs, and about exciting conferences that accompany the introduction of new products in events to announce boring updates. China’s use of national interests as an incentive for innovation is not far from the US narrative that preceded the technological revolution in the United States. Like the space race during the Cold War between the United States and the Soviet Union, which paved the way for Silicon Valley, many of these developments can end until it is double use, which offer consumers benefits at the end of the series. It is too early for US policymakers to look at the destruction of the Internet and Consumer Technology sectors in China as signs of victory in this Cold War. On the contrary, it is wise for Washington to encourage the research activity that has been paid to achieve a goal, whether in universities or independent laboratories, instead of leaving America’s pursuit of the whims and interests of major technology companies. In short, the article indicates that the Chinese technological sector has seen a remarkable decline since 2020 as a result of the government’s limitation, as the number of new businesses has decreased and the market value of the largest businesses such as “Ali Baby” and “Tinetnet” has decreased. However, technological innovation in China has not delayed, but President Xi Jinping has aimed at achieving national goals such as technological hegemony and safety, especially in areas such as artificial intelligence and green energy. Despite US restrictions on technology exports, China continues to reach progress in producing advanced chips and technologies, which can affect the balance of world powers.